How do illegals affect housing
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Immigration — legal and illegal — increases housing demand, but experts and major studies say it is not the dominant cause of the U.S. affordability crisis; constrained supply, zoning and native-born household growth drove the big price moves since the pandemic (Harvard Joint Center, NYT, FactCheck) [1] [2] [3]. Estimates of the undocumented population and its effect vary widely across sources: J.P. Morgan cited ~11.2 million undocumented and linked the influx to tighter supply in 2025 [4], while FactCheck and WRAL specialists estimate illegal immigration’s effect on median house prices is small — under 1% by one academic’s estimate [3] [5].
1. Demand rises with newcomers but timing matters
Economists and housing researchers agree more people equals more housing demand; immigrants, particularly recent arrivals, are disproportionately renters and therefore affect rental markets first. The Harvard Joint Center notes immigrants “play a role in household growth” but emphasizes the timing — the recent immigration surge does not neatly line up with the sharp rent and price increases that began with the pandemic, which were driven mainly by native-born household growth amid scarce supply [1].
2. Quantifying the undocumented share is disputed
Estimates of how many undocumented people live in the U.S. diverge in reporting and shape conclusions. J.P. Morgan’s analysis used an estimate of about 11.2 million undocumented people and treated that influx as one contributing factor to a 2025 housing shortage [4]. HUD’s report as described in Fox News cited “an estimated 15 million illegal immigrants” and linked foreign-born residents to a large share of rental demand growth, but that figure and interpretation sit alongside skeptical takes from other outlets [6].
3. Multiple studies say the immigrant effect on prices is limited
FactCheck and WRAL reviewed claims that illegal immigrants are a primary driver of high home prices and conclude experts do not support that claim; one University of Washington researcher estimated illegal immigration’s impact on current median sales price at under 1% [3] [5]. Columnists and economists at sites like Marginal Revolution likewise argue that other factors — zoning, limited new construction, rising incomes and native population changes — are the principal drivers [7].
4. Rental markets feel shocks earlier and locally
Journalistic reporting and analysts show immigration shifts tend to register first in rental occupancy and lower-end apartment markets. Marketplace reporting found apartment vacancies and lease activity in immigrant-heavy Houston neighborhoods moved with immigration policy changes and enforcement, illustrating how local rental markets can be sensitive even when national price aggregates show smaller effects [8].
5. Some institutional voices tie immigration to national shortages
Think tanks and advocacy groups differ sharply. FAIR and similar organizations frame immigration (legal and illegal) as a major structural cause of housing stress and advocate reducing inflows as a primary remedy [9] [10]. J.P. Morgan presented a more measured finance-sector view that undocumented inflows, combined with persistent supply constraints and interest rates, “may be contributing” to shortages [4]. These are policy-driven interpretations with implicit agendas: advocacy groups press for lower immigration, while financial and academic players stress multi-causal explanations.
6. Supply-side constraints are consistently central in reporting
The clearest consensus across high-quality reporting is that limited housing construction and restrictive local rules are central to the affordability crisis. The New York Times and Harvard Joint Center highlight that national homebuilding has lagged for decades and that zoning and local land-use rules — not immigration alone — are what prevent supply from meeting demand [2] [1].
7. What policymakers and the public should keep in mind
Available sources do not present a single, definitive causal split between immigration and other factors. Journalistic and academic accounts urge policy responses focused on increasing supply (more building, zoning reform) and targeted rental assistance as more direct fixes to affordability than immigration controls alone [2] [1]. At the same time, local rental markets and some national reports show that immigration flows materially affect occupancy and demand patterns, meaning migration policy changes do have housing consequences in some places [8] [4].
Limitations and disagreements: scholars disagree on magnitudes; advocacy groups and some government reports emphasize immigration’s role more strongly than neutral academic reviews [9] [1] [3]. Data on undocumented populations remain imprecise and yield different policy conclusions depending on which estimates and time windows are used [4] [5].