Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What US cities had the largest Muslim populations in 2025 and how were those counts estimated?
Executive Summary
The core claim is that New York City, followed by several Sunbelt and legacy immigrant cities (Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Dearborn/Detroit metro, Paterson, Minneapolis–St. Paul, Philadelphia, and Dallas–Fort Worth), hosted the largest Muslim populations in 2025, and that those counts are drawn from a mix of state- and city-level estimates, community counts, and demographic modeling rather than a single federal source. Estimates vary widely because analysts rely on different inputs — state population estimates projected to 2025, mosque and congregation counts, sampling surveys, and cohort-component projection models — producing conflicting city rankings and magnitudes [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. The headline claims people repeat — who is said to be largest and why that matters
Multiple pieces assert New York City as the single largest Muslim-concentration city, with legacy immigrant hubs (Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston) and strong local enclaves such as Dearborn and Paterson also named among the top locales. Sources that enumerate states and metros give New York, California, and Illinois the highest state-level totals (New York ~724,000; California ~504,000; Illinois ~474,000) and infer city-level prominence from those state tallies [2] [3]. Other write-ups compile “top-10” city lists emphasizing community life, mosque density, and cultural infrastructure — indicators of significance even where precise numeric counts aren’t provided [1]. The practical implication is that multiple cities host vibrant Muslim communities, but the label “largest” depends on whether one measures metro-area totals, city proper counts, or percentages of local populations.
2. How analysts actually estimate Muslim populations — methods and limitations
Researchers and journalists use three common approaches: extrapolating state-level demographic estimates to cities; counting congregational adherents and mosque membership from religious bodies; and running cohort-component projection models that incorporate fertility, mortality, migration, and religious switching. Each approach has trade-offs: state extrapolations mask intra-state concentration; congregation counts undercount unaffiliated Muslims and double-count congregants who attend multiple institutions; projection models require assumptions about fertility and retention that vary by study [5] [4] [6]. Crucially, there is no comprehensive federal religious-question dataset in US decennial census releases, so these methods produce plausible but non-identical results and leave margins of error that are rarely reported explicitly [7] [8].
3. Contradictions in the numbers — why New York often tops lists but magnitudes differ
Some sources place New York City at the top and give it hundreds of thousands of Muslims, while others highlight metro areas like Toronto or project far larger long-term totals for North American cities [4] [7]. The variance arises because one set of sources focalizes on 2025 short-term estimates derived from state projections and community counts (New York ~724,000 at state level), while other analyses apply long-horizon cohort models that redistribute population shares across metros and include Canadian cities in hemispheric lists [2] [4]. The practical takeaway is that New York’s lead is consistent across methodologies, but exact counts differ because analysts are not measuring the same geography or using the same inputs.
4. Emerging regional patterns — Sunbelt growth, legacy enclaves, and data blind spots
Beyond the headline cities, analysts identify strong growth in Sunbelt metros (Orlando, Austin, Atlanta) and emphasize entrenched enclaves like Dearborn and Paterson that punch above their population weight in terms of institutional infrastructure [1] [4]. Projection studies emphasize second‑generation dynamics and retention as drivers of long-term growth, forecasting dramatic relative increases in some southern and mid‑western metros by mid-century [4]. A major blind spot remains: changes since 2020 are unevenly captured because many data sources still rely on the 2020 Religion Census, older surveys, or community reporting; subscription analyses and proprietary projections add insights but limit transparency about methodology [5] [7].
5. What to believe and what to ask next — guidance for journalists, policymakers, and community leaders
Treat 2025 city-level Muslim-population figures as best estimates with important caveats: prefer sources that disclose methodology (sample frames, projection assumptions, congregational coverage) and specify geography (city proper vs. metro area). Where precision matters, triangulate: use state-level projections for scale, religion-census or mosque-adherent counts for local institutional footprint, and cohort models for future trajectories [3] [5] [4]. For policy or reporting, request confidence intervals, note whether counts include foreign-born vs. US-born, and flag potential agendas — advocacy outlets may emphasize growth and vibrancy, while analytical reports stress uncertainty and methodological limits [1] [8].