Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which US states have seen the largest increase in immigrant populations since 2021?
Executive Summary
Multiple analyses point to Florida and California as the two states with the largest recent gains in immigrant population, but different data series and time windows produce different leaders and magnitudes. A November 2021 Census‑survey jump highlighted Florida, while broader net migration totals from April 2020–July 2024 show Florida, California and Texas leading — methodological differences explain the divergence [1] [2].
1. Bold claim: Florida surged most in the immediate 2020–2021 period
One source using CPS counts comparing November 2020 to November 2021 identifies Florida (+615,000) and California (+451,000) as the largest state increases in foreign‑born residents for that interval, followed by Arizona, Wisconsin, and Virginia (with +173k, +156k, +135k respectively). This finding comes from an analysis that focused specifically on the change between those two November snapshots and reported a record 46.2 million foreign‑born in November 2021, framing the 2020–2021 period as a notable year of redistribution and growth concentrated in certain Sunbelt and nontraditional destination states [1]. The source’s emphasis on a single‑year jump makes Florida’s increase particularly prominent and forms the basis for claims about dramatic short‑term shifts.
2. Bigger window: Florida, California and Texas lead on net international migration through 2024
A different dataset measuring net international migration from April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2024 shows Florida [3] [4] [5], California [6] [7] and Texas [8] [9] as the largest net gainers over that multi‑year span. Those figures come from state‑level migration tallies aggregated across several years and capture both ongoing arrivals and departures, producing larger cumulative totals for the highest‑population states. This perspective emphasizes that when you widen the time window beyond a single year, Texas reappears among the top gainers and Florida’s lead narrows relative to California and Texas, illustrating how time framing changes which states appear to have the “largest increase” [2].
3. Context from national summaries: total immigrant population and trends
Summaries of overall immigrant totals and characteristics provide context but do not replace state‑level change measures. One source notes the United States had 53.3 million foreign‑born residents (15.8% of the population) as of January 2025, which situates state changes within a larger national stock of immigrants but does not specify state‑by‑state increases since 2021 [10]. Another synthesis highlights broader trends and policy influences on immigrant numbers, including reports of both declines and rebounds depending on legal status categories and enforcement changes; these national findings complicate simple interpretations of state increases because national net totals and legal status composition shift for reasons beyond local attraction [11] [12].
4. Why different sources disagree: methods, time windows and definitions
The apparent contradictions arise from three technical differences. First, survey timing matters: the CPS November‑to‑November comparison isolates a single‑year spike [1], while net migration measures accumulate across multiple calendar years [2]. Second, data sources differ — CPS, ACS and administrative counts each have sampling frames and margins of error that affect state estimates; single‑year CPS jumps can reflect sampling variance or short‑term mobility. Third, what is counted varies: some tallies count foreign‑born residents at a point in time, others measure net international migration flows; some include undocumented migrants differently. These methodological distinctions explain why Florida can top one list but share the lead with California and Texas on another [1] [2].
5. Missing pieces and potential agendas you should weigh
Several of the provided items lack direct state‑by‑state change metrics or present historical shares rather than recent deltas; promotional materials and aggregated summaries contribute little to the precise question. The CIS piece that highlights the November 2021 spike has been used in policy debates emphasizing rapid, short‑term change and may be cited by actors arguing for stricter or looser immigration measures, so watch for advocacy framing when that source is cited [1]. Conversely, broad net‑migration tallies may downplay short‑term surges by smoothing across years. The St. Louis Fed and other historical share analyses show long‑term patterns but do not resolve which states gained most since 2021 [13].
6. Bottom line: answer depends on your metric — short‑term spike vs. multi‑year accumulation
If you measure the single‑year CPS change from November 2020–November 2021, Florida and California show the largest increases, with Arizona, Wisconsin and Virginia following; that snapshot captures a sharp redistribution in one year [1]. If you measure net international migration across April 2020–July 2024, Florida, California and Texas lead in cumulative gains [2]. National summaries confirm the U.S. immigrant stock is large and evolving but do not replace state‑level flow measures [10] [12]. Choose the metric — single‑year change, cumulative net migration, or change in foreign‑born share — to determine which states appear to have the largest increases, and note that methodological choices materially alter the answer [1] [2] [13].