Are there verified reports of Venezuelans eating pets or is it misinformation?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Documented hardship in Venezuela has led to people buying animal-formulated food for human consumption and to isolated, graphic local reports and videos suggesting some individuals have eaten pets or zoo animals; however, many sensational claims remain unverified or disputed and have been amplified for political effect [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Hardship on the ground: why these stories emerge
Decades of economic collapse and hyperinflation left Venezuelans cutting meals, losing weight and facing extreme food insecurity, creating conditions where nontraditional food sources become attractive or necessary, a reality documented by reporting and human-rights groups [5] [2]. Independent observers and rights organizations have recorded that people buy food marketed for animals to consume themselves as a coping strategy during shortages, with consumer visits to markets corroborated by Provea’s verification that dog food and similar products have been purchased for human ingestion [1].
2. Documentary fragments: videos and local press accounts
There are specific, localized instances published in news outlets and on social media that purport to show people butchering or eating dogs or other animals; one case cited by local media presented footage of a man allegedly eating a dog on a street in Carabobo state [6]. Likewise, multiple reports dating back to the crisis years claim thefts at zoos and consumption of zoo animals, with authorities and journalists quoting police statements about seizures and intentions that allegedly included eating animals [7] [8]. These items form the evidentiary base for claims that some Venezuelans have resorted to eating pets or exotic animals.
3. Verification gaps and contested narratives
Major caveats surround many of these stories: investigative outlets have flagged that several high-profile claims—especially about mass scenes of people eating pets or systematic slaughter of zoo populations by starving citizens—lack conclusive verification and sometimes rely on secondhand reports, social-media posts or single-source assertions [3] [4]. Authorities in some cases have attributed zoo thefts to organized criminality rather than widespread hunger, and investigative reporters have raised questions about the provenance, context and scale of viral images and anecdotes [4].
4. How political messaging and sensationalism shape the record
Sensational accounts of Venezuelans “eating pets” have been repeatedly weaponized in political rhetoric abroad and domestically to caricature the state of the country or to make domestic policy points—examples include commentary and partisan amplification of such stories in international media and by public figures—which complicates efforts to separate isolated tragic acts from systematic phenomena [9] [10]. Some opinion pieces and punditry extrapolated isolated incidents into sweeping claims, while fact-checkers and nuanced reporters urged caution and pointed to broader structural causes of hunger rather than moralizing singular images [3] [4].
5. What can be stated with confidence — and what cannot
It is verifiable that Venezuela’s food crisis is severe and that some people have purchased pet-formulated food for human consumption, a practice confirmed by Provea investigators [1] [2]. It is also factual that individual, locally reported incidents and videos exist alleging people ate pets or zoo animals [6] [7]. What cannot be confidently asserted from the available reporting is that there has been widespread, systematic, nationally representative behavior of Venezuelans routinely eating pets; many dramatic claims remain unverified or contested, and some reporting has relied on rumor, single sources or politically motivated amplification [3] [4].
6. Bottom line and implications for readers and reporters
The truthful needle lands between two extremes: the humanitarian crisis has produced desperate coping strategies, including documented purchases of animal food for human use, and there are isolated, disturbing accounts and videos of people consuming animals; however, broad claims that Venezuelans generally or routinely eat pets are not fully substantiated by rigorous, corroborated reporting and have frequently been exaggerated in politicized coverage [1] [3] [4]. Responsible reporting requires distinguishing verified incidents from viral anecdotes, attributing motives cautiously, and situating any grisly image within verified evidence of food insecurity rather than allowing it to substitute for comprehensive investigation [2] [11].