Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Which Texas town has been associated with attempts to implement Sharia law?
Executive summary
Reports and political statements repeatedly link a proposed development called “EPIC City” (later rebranded by developers as “The Meadow” or a Muslim-themed neighborhood) near Josephine, northeast of Dallas, with fears that it would operate under Sharia law; Texas officials including Governor Greg Abbott have called it a “Sharia compound” and pushed investigations and new laws in response [1] [2] [3]. Coverage also records pushback: developers and Muslim community leaders say they will obey U.S. and Texas law, and civil-rights groups describe the probe and rhetoric as Islamophobic [4] [5] [6].
1. A single town named in political rhetoric: EPIC City / The Meadow
The place repeatedly tied to attempts to implement Sharia law in recent Texas coverage is the proposed development promoted by the East Plano Islamic Center, initially called “EPIC City” — a 400‑plus acre Muslim‑themed community near Josephine — which critics and Governor Abbott labeled a prospective “Sharia compound” [2] [1] [3]. Reporting notes the project later rebranded as “The Meadow,” a change developers said was meant to reduce public confusion about whether it would be an independent city or a standard subdivision [7].
2. What state officials have done and claimed
Governor Abbott publicly asserted that Sharia law is “not allowed in Texas,” signed legislation aimed at banning “Sharia compounds,” and in November 2025 called for investigations into what he described as Sharia tribunals or courts in North Texas, asking prosecutors and state law enforcement to investigate possible violations [2] [8] [9]. Abbott’s office has also designated certain groups and pushed legal steps that would limit land acquisition and empower enforcement against entities it deems to be imposing Sharia [1] [10].
3. Developers’ and Muslim community responses
Project organizers and leaders associated with the East Plano Islamic Center insist the development would operate within U.S. and Texas law and deny plans to impose Sharia as a parallel legal system; they told reporters they would obey state and federal law [4] [3]. Coverage cites developers’ statements that the project is a neighborhood with a mosque and school at its center rather than a sovereign or legally separate entity [4] [5].
4. Legal and legislative context cited by commentators
Journalists and policy events report that the controversy has spurred legislative activity — for example, HB 4211 and other measures requiring property disclosures and ensuring disputes are adjudicated under Texas/U.S. law — and that the Texas Supreme Court has grappled with religious arbitration and enforceability issues in family law contexts [11]. Critics of the development say existing protections must be enforced to prevent exclusionary or parallel‑law arrangements [6].
5. Pushback and accusations of Islamophobia
Civil‑rights organizations and some media outlets say the framing of the project as a “Sharia city” fuels Islamophobic tropes; the Council on American‑Islamic Relations (CAIR) and others argue that Sharia is primarily a religious and moral framework and that warnings about criminal Sharia imposition are inflammatory and legally meaningless [6]. News outlets covering the story have highlighted that investigators have not produced evidence showing organizers intended to supersede U.S. law [10] [5].
6. Gaps in public reporting and what’s not found
Available sources do not mention any court judgment or conclusive public evidence that EPIC City/The Meadow actually intended to or did impose Sharia law as a legal system overriding Texas law; rather, reporting records investigations, political rhetoric, developer denials, and legislative responses [10] [4] [3]. Sources also do not report successful establishment of an autonomous Sharia court system in that development that superseded state courts [9] [8].
7. Why this matters — competing agendas and media effects
Coverage shows competing agendas: state officials frame the issue as a preemptive defense of Texas legal order and public safety ahead of an electoral cycle [1] [8], while developers and civil‑rights advocates frame state actions as overreach that stigmatizes a Muslim community and may violate religious liberty [5] [6]. Independent commentary ranges from alarmist outlets portraying a cultural takeover [7] to mainstream outlets emphasizing legal limits and developer denials [3] [4]; readers should weigh partisan timing, political incentives, and the absence of publicly disclosed evidence of a functioning Sharia legal regime in the development when assessing claims [1] [6].
If you want, I can pull direct timelines of the investigations and legislation cited (e.g., HB 4211, Abbott press releases, and the dates of the state probes) using the same set of sources.