Why dont ppl like maduim in new york

1. What the question really asks: distinguishing targets and why that matters

The phrase "why don’t people like maduim in New York" is ambiguous; the evidence available points to two relevant subjects—Medium, the online publishing platform with a notable New York footprint, and the pop-cultural figure of the Long Island Medium—so any answer must separate structural complaints about a media platform from cultural or ethical objections to psychic entertainment to avoid conflating business criticism with personal skepticism ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

2. Platform backlash: Medium’s business troubles and changing expectations

Criticism of the Medium platform is rooted in tangible business setbacks and evolving reader expectations: Medium laid off staff and closed its New York and D.C. offices in a past restructuring that undermined confidence in its stability and editorial future ^[1], and broader industry trends—publishers pushing writers to be "creators," declining traffic and new monetization pressures—have made audiences and contributors more skeptical about platforms that pivot toward personality-driven or algorithmic content over vetted journalism ^{[4] [2]}.

3. Product and perception: why platform changes breed dislike

When a platform tightens resources and leans on creator-first strategies, users often perceive drops in quality, inconsistent moderation, and a loss of institutional authority; reporting notes publishers expect major shifts in discovery and revenue models and that audiences now have outsized power to punish outlets that trade editorial rigor for sensationalism or personality, which fuels negative sentiment toward companies like Medium in media hubs such as New York ^{[4] [2]}.

4. The culture-wars overlay: distrust amplified by polarized media narratives

The broader media environment in 2025–26—marked by high-profile editorial controversies, accusations of racial insensitivity, and debates over the role of viewpoint-driven outlets—creates a climate in which any perceived editorial misstep or pivot to partisan content invites sharp public backlash; critics argue culture-war framing can be used as a "smoke screen" to reshape coverage in service of ownership preferences, heightening New Yorkers’ skepticism of media brands ^{[5] [6]}.

5. Entertainers vs. institutions: why psychic acts provoke particular ire

Separate from digital platforms, performers who claim supernatural access, like the Long Island Medium, draw a different register of dislike: investigative and anecdotal accounts show that staged-seeming readings, insistence on specific claims, and selective presentation of hits over misses lead many New Yorkers—especially a city with strong skeptical and journalistic traditions—to view such acts as exploitative or faux theatrics rather than legitimate services ^[3].

6. Two audiences, two grievances—but overlapping mechanisms

Whether the target is a tech platform or a celebrity psychic, the mechanics of dislike overlap: perceived deception (real or structural), visible commercial retrenchment or opportunism, and a media ecosystem that rewards sensationalism all erode trust; reporting about layoffs and strategy shifts at Medium ^[1] and firsthand accounts questioning psychic performances ^[3] both illustrate how credibility deficits translate into public disfavor in New York’s discerning media market ^{[4] [2]}.

7. Alternative explanations and reporting limits

Other plausible drivers—local politics, demographic changes, or targeted misinformation campaigns—could also shape dislike in ways not fully captured by the supplied reporting; the sources document business decisions, industry-wide trends and an individual performance account, but they do not provide comprehensive polling of New Yorkers’ attitudes specifically toward "maduim," so this analysis remains tied to the documented threads above ^{[1] [3] [4]}.