Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Anthony Richardson was not a good QB in 2024 and it is really tiresome seeing talking heads bend over backwards to make excuses for him.

Checked on March 19, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statistical evidence strongly supports that Anthony Richardson had significant struggles in 2024. He ranked #28 among quarterbacks [1], with some sources ranking him even lower at #35 overall [2]. His performance metrics were concerning:

  • Completion rate below 48% [2]
  • 11 touchdowns to 13 interceptions in his career [3]
  • 61.6 quarterback rating [3]
  • Team record of 8-9 with 22.2 PPG (ranked 17th) [4]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual factors were omitted from the original statement:

  • Limited Experience: Richardson came into the NFL with limited college experience [5], suggesting he was always likely to need development time
  • Draft Status: He was selected 4th overall due to his physical abilities and potential [5]
  • External Factors: Poor play-calling and weak offensive support may have contributed to his struggles [1]
  • Early Promise: The Colts' management was initially encouraged by his performance in 2023, with GM Chris Ballard specifically praising his passing ability [6]
  • Development Timeline: 2025 is considered a critical year for his development [2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents several biased elements:

  • It dismisses legitimate contextual factors as "excuses," when some explanations (like poor offensive support and play-calling) are documented concerns [1]
  • It ignores the developmental aspect of young quarterbacks, particularly those with limited college experience [5]
  • The statement's emotional tone ("really tiresome") suggests personal frustration rather than objective analysis

Who benefits from these narratives:

  • Media personalities benefit from strong, polarizing takes about high-draft-pick quarterbacks
  • Competing teams and agents benefit from Richardson being labeled a "bust" early
  • The Colts' management has a vested interest in maintaining patience and highlighting potential, as evidenced by their public support [6]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?