What is Charlie Kirk's stance on mental health in sports, particularly regarding Simone Biles?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that Charlie Kirk made harsh comments about Simone Biles, calling her a 'sociopath' and a 'shame to the country' after she withdrew from the Olympics due to mental health reasons [1] [2] [3]. Kirk's perspective emphasizes the importance of performance and resilience, but has been criticized for being insensitive and harmful to the conversation about mental well-being [1]. Additionally, Kirk responded to one of Biles' posts in 2025, saying 'Unlike you, Riley never quit when things got hard' [3]. It is also reported that after Kirk's death, a false rumor circulated online claiming Biles had written a blog post responding to his past remarks, but fact-checks confirmed that Biles never made any statement about Kirk's death [3] [4].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Some analyses highlight the importance of considering the context in which Kirk made his comments, including the cultural and social pressures on athletes to perform [3]. Others emphasize the need to prioritize mental health and well-being, particularly in the sports industry [5]. Alternative viewpoints suggest that Kirk's comments were not only harmful to Biles, but also damaging to the broader conversation about mental health and sports [6]. Furthermore, some sources note that Kirk's influence on young people and the conservative movement should be taken into account when evaluating his comments [7]. Key omitted facts include the lack of direct quotes from Kirk regarding Biles' mental health in sports [3], and the absence of public statements from Biles regarding Kirk's death or his past comments about her [3] [4].
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be misleading in its portrayal of Charlie Kirk's stance on mental health in sports, as it does not provide a nuanced or contextualized understanding of his comments [1]. Some sources suggest that Kirk's comments were taken out of context or misrepresented in the media, which could contribute to misinformation and bias [3]. The fact that a false rumor circulated online claiming Biles had written a blog post responding to Kirk's past remarks highlights the potential for misinformation and disinformation in this topic [3] [4]. Those who benefit from this framing include conservative media outlets and influencers who may use Kirk's comments to promote their own agendas and values [7] [6].