What are the current hall of fame voting trends for first basemen?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
First-base candidates are not dominant on recent BBWAA ballots: in the 2025 BBWAA vote no player listed as a primary first baseman was elected, and only a few position players who spent significant time at first — notably Carlos Beltrán (70.3% in 2025, though primarily an outfielder/catcher) and Andruw Jones (66.2%) — cleared high percentages; returning first-base–type candidates for the 2026 ballot include several carryovers but none vaulted to induction (Hall rules require 75%) [1] [2]. Era-committee elections and changing voter standards are reshaping the pathway for corner-infielders: the Contemporary Era Committee can and did elect corner players (Jeff Kent) independent of writer trends, and its choices may indirectly alter BBWAA thinking about peak vs. counting-value resumes [3] [4].
1. First basemen’s visibility: scarce in recent BBWAA winners
Writers’ 2025 choices centered on pitchers, outfielders and relievers; first baseman-dedicated names do not headline the recent inductees, and the 2025 BBWAA ballot elected Ichiro, CC Sabathia and Billy Wagner — none primarily a first baseman — indicating that first-base profiles are not currently carrying the writers’ electorate [1]. Baseball-Reference’s 2025 summary confirms the three BBWAA inductees and the broader list of returned candidates, showing first-base representation was limited among winners [5].
2. Who at first is still on the ballot — and how they’re faring
The Hall’s 2026 BBWAA ballot notes that Carlos Beltrán (a player who spent time across the defense) was a 70.3% vote-getter in 2025 and is returning in 2026; Andruw Jones (primarily an outfielder) was the only other returning candidate above 50% (66.2%), underscoring that pure first-base specialists were not the primary near-inductees in 2025 [2]. Baseball-Reference and MLB’s vote pages list the full totals and show that many position players — including several corner types — remain on ballots but haven’t yet reached the 75% threshold [5] [1].
3. The era committee as an alternative route for corner infielders
Contemporary and Era Committees have become important for players whose BBWAA cases stall. The Contemporary Era Committee elected Jeff Kent in its 2026 consideration, demonstrating that a middle- or corner-infield candidate can reach Cooperstown through committee routes even while BBWAA support lags [3]. The committees’ different electorates — Hall members, executives and historians — often reward different mixes of peak performance and career context than the writers do [6] [3].
4. Changing voter standards: peak vs. counting stats affects first basemen
Analysts and outlets report a recalibration of what voters prize: there is increased emphasis on peak seasons, defensive value, championship context and off-field questions, not just raw counting stats. The Athletic’s coverage of Hall voting evolution argues that committee choices and recent writer behavior are forcing voters to rethink comparisons, which can cut both ways for first basemen (who often have big counting resumes but sometimes weaker peaks) [4]. JustBaseball’s preview pieces and ballot trackers likewise show writers parsing different value signals year to year [6] [7].
5. Practical trends for first-base candidates going forward
- If a first baseman’s case is primarily counting statistics (high career hits, RBI, homers) without dominant peak seasons, writers may be slow to enshrine him — but era committees or changing standards could help later [4] [3].
- Candidates who showed strong peaks, defensive value, or were central to championship teams have better odds of persuading writers or committees, per recent commentary on voting dynamics [4] [2].
- The Hall’s rulebook — 75% for election, 5% minimum to stay on the ballot — continues to shape trajectories; players falling under 5% are dropped from the BBWAA pathway [5] [8].
6. Limits of available reporting and disagreements among observers
Sources here document election totals and committee outcomes but do not provide a unified metric isolating “first baseman” trends specifically; MLB.com and Baseball-Reference report vote totals [1] [5], while The Athletic and other analysis pieces interpret evolving standards [4]. Some outlets argue committee elections influence writers; others note committees and writers are distinct electorates and may diverge — both positions appear in the reporting [4] [3]. Available sources do not mention a comprehensive, source-endorsed ranking of first basemen vote trajectories across multiple years.
If you want, I can extract the 2025–26 vote percentages for every player who spent significant time at first base from the listed vote databases and show where each stands relative to the 75% / 5% cutoffs (data-driven list), using the MLB and Baseball-Reference totals cited above [1] [5].