Fact check: If given even odds, the majority of gamblers would not put significant money on the bet that Anthony Richardson will finish the 2025 NFL season as the Colts starting QB.

1. Summary of the results

The statement appears to be supported by available evidence. Anthony Richardson's status as the Colts' starting QB in 2025 is highly uncertain due to multiple factors:

• His 2024 performance was challenging, with a low 47.7% completion rate and more interceptions than touchdowns ^[1]
• The Colts have signed Daniel Jones and created an "open competition" for the starting role ^[2]
• Richardson has a concerning injury history, including both shoulder and back injuries that ended his season ^{[3] [4]}

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original statement:

• While Richardson's passing stats were poor, he showed promise in the running game with 499 yards and 6 rushing touchdowns ^[1]
• The Colts haven't completely given up on Richardson - they've created a competition scenario rather than outright replacing him ^[2]
• The statement focuses on gambling odds but doesn't mention that professional gamblers use sophisticated mathematical analysis to assess risks and expected values ^[5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement presents several potential biases:

• It frames the situation purely through a gambling lens, which may oversimplify the complex factors involved in NFL quarterback development ^[6]
• It doesn't acknowledge that Richardson's struggles might be related to his injuries rather than his abilities ^[4]
• The statement implies a binary outcome (starter/non-starter) when NFL quarterback situations are often more nuanced

Beneficiaries of different narratives:

• Sports betting companies benefit from uncertainty around Richardson's status as it drives betting activity
• The Colts benefit from maintaining ambiguity about the QB position as it keeps both players motivated
• Daniel Jones and his representatives benefit from narratives questioning Richardson's ability to start