How does the WNBA determine a player's gender for competition purposes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The WNBA’s publicly stated governing documents do not include a detailed, standalone transgender eligibility rule; its 2022 Collective Bargaining Agreement says “Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA,” without defining how gender is determined [1]. Some legal and advocacy reporting describes professional leagues (including the WNBA) as allowing transgender women to compete when they meet sport-specific criteria used elsewhere—such as declared gender identity and hormone levels—but explicit WNBA procedural rules are not detailed in the available documents [2] [3].
1. WNBA’s written line: “Only players who are women” — and what that leaves unanswered
The most concrete, citable language found in the public reporting is the 2022 Collective Bargaining Agreement statement that “Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA,” but that clause does not explain the mechanics for determining who counts as a woman for roster eligibility [1]. The WNBA rulebook is available as a document download [4], yet the sources provided do not quote a WNBA policy that lays out medical tests, testosterone thresholds, legal-document requirements, or time-in-gender rules for transgender players [4] [1]. Available sources do not mention a specific WNBA protocol for verifying gender beyond that eligibility phrase.
2. How other bodies set the precedent: identity + medical markers
Reporting and legal summaries show a pattern used by many sports organizations: eligibility decisions are often left to each sport’s governing body and commonly apply a mix of declared gender identity plus medical criteria such as maintained testosterone levels for set periods [2]. FindLaw’s roundup notes that national governing bodies and professional leagues typically base trans-woman eligibility on maintaining specific testosterone thresholds and a period of declared gender identity—language that other organizations use though the WNBA’s own procedural details are not quoted there [2].
3. Competing narratives inside and outside the league
Advocacy voices within women’s sport circles and commentators document divergent approaches across leagues: some leagues and federations have explicit, sometimes restrictive, biological tests; others emphasize inclusion and self-identification [3] [1]. Legal analysis observes that women’s professional leagues are “not necessarily of one mind,” with organizations adopting differing standards and occasionally facing legal and political pressure to change [3]. The available coverage highlights both calls for inclusion—exemplified by trans and allied WNBA players writing in favor of access—and countervailing moves elsewhere toward stricter, biology-focused screening [5] [6].
4. What recent public debate and examples tell us about practice vs. policy
Commentary from current WNBA players and allies pushes for inclusivity and indicates that transgender and nonbinary players have been part of internal conversations in the league, yet those public calls do not substitute for a clearly published WNBA eligibility procedure [5]. Third‑party trackers like the Women’s Sports Policy Working Group summarize the WNBA’s stated eligibility line and note no explicit mention of gender identity in the agreement—an observation that underscores a gap between headline policy and administrative practice [1].
5. Outside models and emerging rules to watch
Other sports authorities have recently moved toward stricter, biology‑based screening, including genetic tests or mandatory hormone thresholds for female-category eligibility in international competition—trends that could influence discussion in U.S. pro leagues [7]. FindLaw and legal analyses point to frameworks used elsewhere—testosterone levels, time-in-gender declarations, and sport-specific judgments—demonstrating the kinds of criteria the WNBA might adopt if it chose to formalize procedures [2] [3].
6. What we can and cannot conclude from available sources
Available sources do not mention a WNBA rulebook section that specifies how the league administratively determines a player’s gender for competition [4] [1]. We can say with citation that the league’s CBA limits eligibility to “women” [1], and that commentators and legal summaries describe typical sport-by-sport practices—identity declarations plus biological markers—in other organizations [2] [3]. We cannot, based on the supplied reporting, assert a definitive WNBA procedure, a recent rule change banning trans players, or the existence of a WNBA testosterone or gene‑testing program—those specifics are not found in the current material [4] [1] [6].
7. Why this matters and what to watch next
The gap between a simple eligibility line (“only players who are women”) and an operational verification process is where most disputes, legal challenges and public debate arise; observers should watch official WNBA rulebook updates (the downloadable rule book is the primary public repository), collective-bargaining language, and statements from the league or players’ association for any added procedural detail [4] [1]. Broader shifts in international sport toward biological testing or legal rulings about gender identity could prompt the WNBA to clarify its approach; keep an eye on reporting that quotes league policy text or official memos rather than opinion pieces [2] [7].