Fact check: There hasn't been a single generation of graphics cards where you could say that AMD has a better product than NVIDIA.

1. Summary of the results

The original statement is demonstrably incorrect based on multiple sources. AMD has produced graphics cards that not only compete with NVIDIA but sometimes offer better value and performance in specific areas. The RX 7900 XTX specifically "trades blows" with the RTX 4080 Super at higher resolutions ^{[1] [1]} and was priced $200 less than the RTX 4080 while offering similar rasterization performance ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual points need to be considered:

• AMD's competitiveness varies by specific performance metrics:
• AMD excels particularly in rasterization performance ^{[1] [1]}
• NVIDIA maintains leadership in ray tracing technology ^[2]
• AMD currently has no direct competitor to the flagship RTX 4090 ^[2]
• Price-to-performance ratio is crucial:
• Models like the RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 GRE offer strong value for money ^[2]
• AMD often provides similar performance at lower price points, as demonstrated by the $200 price difference with the RTX 4080 ^[2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The statement appears to show significant bias and oversimplification:

• Beneficiaries of this narrative:
• NVIDIA benefits from the perception of complete market dominance
• Retailers and distributors might benefit from pushing higher-margin NVIDIA products
• Content creators and tech influencers often have established relationships with NVIDIA
• The reality is more nuanced: The sources indicate that AMD has produced competitive products, with some industry experts even considering switching from NVIDIA to AMD products ^[2]. This suggests that the original statement's absolute nature ("hasn't been a single generation") is misleading and ignores the complex reality of the GPU market's competitive dynamics.