Are there time-stamped satellite images showing changes or installations of the Buga Sphere over time?

1. What journalists and advocates say about visual records

Multiple accounts emphasize local video and laboratory imaging as the core visual evidence: eyewitness smartphone video of a sphere over Buga, X‑ray and radiographic scans revealing internal structure, and high‑magnification microscopy used in material analysis ^{[1] [4] [2]}. Prominent promoters staged press events and released radiographic/scan results rather than satellite stills ^[3]. None of these pieces in the provided set point to a public archive of dated satellite frames showing the sphere in the sky before recovery (available sources do not mention public satellite archives).

2. Claims about overwritten or withheld satellite logs — what’s sourced

One article asserts that “satellite overwatch logs leaked from a European space‑agency contractor reveal that infrared frames capturing the Buga Sphere were deliberately overwritten with star‑field composites” ^[5]. That is a strong allegation of tampering but is presented in a longform piece whose sourcing and verification are not detailed in the excerpt; other sources in the set do not corroborate leaked, time‑stamped satellite imagery being released or independently validated (p1_s1; other sources silent).

3. Independent scientific imaging versus geospatial archives

Technical reports cited in these sources focus on lab techniques — X‑rays, radiography, microscopic scans and thermal imaging — to study the object’s composition and internal architecture (three concentric layers, optical fibers, microspheres) ^{[1] [3] [6]}. Those methods produce high‑resolution internal images but are not satellite mosaics or temporal orbital imagery. The available corpus shows no chain of custody or metadata tying any space‑based sensor frames to the site and timeframe of sightings (available sources do not mention satellite metadata).

4. Why satellite evidence would matter — and why it’s absent in reporting

Time‑stamped satellite frames could independently establish when and where an object appeared and whether multiple installations occurred. Reporting instead concentrates on ground videos and physical analysis, likely because rapid local recovery and civilian custody limited opportunities for coordinated satellite tasking or preserved orbital datasets. The sources show active independent analysis by teams who released lab imaging rather than space‑based imagery ^{[1] [6]}.

5. Competing narratives and their agendas

Coverage splits between sensational promoters who describe the sphere as “alien tech” with extraordinary properties and skeptics alleging hoax or misinterpretation ^{[3] [7]}. Advocacy pieces and UFO personalities emphasize suppressed or leaked satellite logs to suggest censorship ^[5], while skeptical outlets point to human‑made explanations and inconsistencies ^{[2] [7]}. The push for satellite evidence functions rhetorically: it would lend independent verification to the promoters’ narrative, and claims of deleted frames serve to delegitimize skeptics—an implicit agenda visible in the sources ^{[5] [7]}.

6. What investigators publicly released — and what remains unreported

Investigators published radiography, X‑rays and microscopy findings (three concentric layers, internal microspheres, optical fibers) and described environmental effects near the site, but the set does not include any published sequence of dated satellite frames or references to official space‑agency imagery releases documenting the sphere in orbit or during descent ^{[1] [3] [8]}. Assertions about satellite image overwriting appear in one longform report but lack corroboration across the rest of the material ^[5].

7. How to verify time‑stamped satellite imagery if it exists

The responsible verification path would be: obtain raw satellite strips or tasking logs (with UTC timestamps and sensor metadata) from providers (commercial imagery firms or national agencies), cross‑check with independent orbital trackers, and validate chain of custody. None of the provided sources shows that step having been completed or that such satellite frames have been made public (available sources do not mention provider data releases).

8. Bottom line for researchers and readers

As of the materials supplied, there are no publicly documented, time‑stamped satellite image sequences that show the Buga Sphere’s appearances or installations over time; reporting centers on local video and post‑recovery lab imaging ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Claims of overwritten or withheld satellite logs surface in partisan pieces but remain unsupported elsewhere in the record ^[5]. Readers should demand raw satellite files with metadata and independent third‑party validation before treating any alleged space‑based imagery as definitive.