Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
In 2025 can a person be tracked looking at sites that some consider to be illegal using TOR Browser?
Executive summary
In 2025 Tor Browser substantially reduces the chance that websites or ordinary trackers can link your browsing to your real IP address or device fingerprint, because it routes traffic through multiple relays and isolates sites (Tor Project; Norton) [1] [2]. However, security researchers and privacy guides warn Tor is not a guarantee: misconfiguration, browser vulnerabilities, malicious relays, traffic-correlation attacks, or risky user behaviour can expose identity or be used by authorities to trace users (Wikipedia; VPNMentor; Norton) [3] [4] [2].
1. How Tor’s protections work — the design that hides you from ordinary trackers
Tor Browser sends your requests through a three-hop network of volunteer relays and aims to make users look alike, deleting cookies and isolating sites to minimize tracking and fingerprinting (Tor Project; The Verge) [1] [5]. That multi‑layer encryption and circuit routing means a visited site generally sees only the IP of the exit node, not your home IP, and entry/exit nodes see only part of the path — the core privacy mechanism Tor advertises (Tor Project; Norton) [1] [2].
2. Where Tor reliably prevents tracking — what you can expect by default
For routine web tracking (third‑party cookies, ad trackers tied to your IP or ordinary browser fingerprinting), Tor Browser’s defaults and site isolation make it “difficult for trackers to trace your activity” and the Project explicitly isolates sites and clears cookies between sessions (Tor Project; CyberGhost) [1] [6]. Privacy tests and reviews continue to give Tor strong marks against typical web trackers when used as intended (PCMag) [7].
3. Known technical limits and attack vectors that can deanonymize users
Tor is not infallible. If an adversary can observe both the user’s entry traffic and the exit traffic (traffic‑correlation), they can sometimes link identity to activity; Wikipedia, Norton, and other guides note this risk and point to past law‑enforcement operations using technical means to deanonymize operators or users [3] [2] [5]. Browser bugs, enabling JavaScript or plugins, downloading files, or installing add‑ons can leak your real IP or make you uniquely identifiable — the Tor Project and multiple guides warn against such behaviours [8] [1] [4].
4. The role of malicious relays, exit nodes and operators
Because Tor relies on volunteer relays, exit nodes can see unencrypted traffic leaving the network; VPNMentor and other sources emphasize that exit nodes may monitor or manipulate HTTP traffic, and that HTTPS remains important to protect content end‑to‑end [4] [8]. Wikipedia and security reporting recount cases where law enforcement or researchers exploited weaknesses or vulnerabilities to locate hidden services or users, underscoring that a determined attacker with capabilities can sometimes breach anonymity [3].
5. Behavioural and operational mistakes that lead to tracking
Most deanonymization in practice comes from user actions: logging into an identifying account, reusing identifying credentials, downloading files that trigger external connections, changing default window sizes, or installing extensions — all of which Tor guidance warns can defeat protections (Tor Project; VPNMentor; The Verge) [1] [4] [5]. Security Q&A communities and experts emphasize that Tor “is one of your best options” for anonymity but explicitly note “there are always possibilities of being tracked” if mistakes occur (StackExchange summaries) [9].
6. Law enforcement, investigations and “can you be tracked for illegal site visits?”
Sources show access to Tor sites is often legal but interacting with illegal services can draw law enforcement scrutiny; law enforcement has, at times, used technical or investigative methods to unmask operators or users of illicit services (Norton; Wikipedia; Surfshark) [2] [3] [10]. VPNMentor and other commentators caution that “it’s likely your activity is being monitored” on parts of the dark web and that Tor alone cannot guarantee safety in adversarial investigations [4].
7. Practical advice if your aim is anonymity or risk reduction
Use the official Tor Browser unchanged, keep it updated, avoid plugins and downloads, keep JavaScript disabled when possible, use HTTPS, and do not log into personal accounts or reuse identifiers — these are the consistent recommendations from Tor Project, Norton, and privacy guides [1] [2] [4]. If you need stronger protection, sources discuss layered defenses (careful operational security, threat models, and sometimes separate tools), but available sources do not prescribe a single foolproof method (available sources do not mention a universal, guaranteed technique).
8. Bottom line — likely outcomes in 2025
For most trackers and passive monitoring, Tor greatly reduces the ability to link a user to visited sites (Tor Project; CyberGhost) [1] [6]. For well‑resourced adversaries, active investigators, or when users make operational mistakes, deanonymization remains possible and has precedent in reporting (Wikipedia; Norton; VPNMentor) [3] [2] [4]. Choose tools and behaviour that match your threat model and consult up‑to‑date guidance from the Tor Project before assuming immunity [1].