Fact check: Can i delete my past checks on factually?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, none of the sources directly address whether users can delete their past checks on Factually. The search results appear to have focused on broader topics related to fact-checking, data deletion policies, and content removal from the internet, but failed to provide specific information about Factually's user data management capabilities.

The most relevant information comes from OpenAI's data policies, which indicate that users can typically delete their chats and data is removed from systems within 30 days, unless legally required to retain it ^[1]. However, this relates to ChatGPT rather than Factually specifically. Additionally, there are current legal complications where OpenAI may be forced to retain consumer content due to a court order ^[1].

Other sources discuss general data removal services and their effectiveness in removing personal information from the internet ^[2], as well as the challenges of removing harmful news articles and reclaiming online reputation ^[3]. One Reddit discussion explores paying companies to remove personal information but highlights the limitations of such approaches ^[4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal several important gaps in addressing the original question:

• No direct information about Factually's specific data retention and deletion policies - None of the sources examined Factually's terms of service, privacy policy, or user account settings
• Lack of technical details about how fact-checking platforms typically handle user data and search histories
• Missing regulatory context - The analyses don't address relevant data protection laws like GDPR or CCPA that might give users rights to data deletion
• No comparison with similar platforms - There's no information about how other fact-checking or AI-powered services handle user data deletion requests

The sources instead focused on Meta's abandonment of third-party fact-checking programs ^{[5] [6] [7]}, which is entirely unrelated to the user's question about deleting personal check history on Factually.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement itself is a straightforward user question and does not contain any apparent misinformation or bias. It's a legitimate inquiry about data privacy and user control over personal information.

However, the search results appear to be poorly targeted, suggesting either:

• The search algorithms failed to understand the specific platform "Factually" being referenced
• There may be limited public information available about Factually's data policies
• The search may have been confused by the general term "factually" rather than recognizing it as a specific platform name

The lack of relevant results could potentially mislead users into thinking that data deletion is not possible or that the question is somehow related to Meta's fact-checking policies, when these are entirely separate issues.