Is double checker discord bot safe and does it store your ip and what does it do with it
Executive summary
Double Counter does collect and store users’ IP addresses and device/browser fingerprint data to detect alternate accounts and block VPNs, retaining that data for up to 24 months and encrypting it during processing, according to its privacy documentation [1]. Debates about whether that practice is “safe” hinge on trade‑offs between server security and privacy risk: the company’s policy emphasizes encryption and non‑human processing [1], while independent critics allege the same data is surfaced or monetized via features like Doogle/Lens and may conflict with regulatory standards [2].
1. What Double Counter says it collects and why
Double Counter’s published privacy policy is explicit that the service collects “primarily your IP address” along with browser fingerprints and other identifying information in order to detect alternate accounts, block VPNs, and protect servers from raids; it states data is automatically processed, encrypted, and not viewed by humans [1]. The bot’s product messaging also frames this collection as necessary for high‑accuracy alt detection and anti‑raid measures, marketing “millions of data points” used to flag accounts and map typical alt behaviors [3]. Those are the company’s stated purposes and technical justifications [1] [3].
2. What the bot does with the IP and fingerprint data
According to the documentation, Double Counter stores IPs and fingerprint data, uses them to associate accounts (link possible alts), and retains association and IP data for as long as 24 months from the last verification attempt [1]. The policy also says Discord IDs are encrypted internally and that verification results — including a Discord ID and username — can be visible in server logs or to premium subscribers like server owners and administrators when the bot reports results [1]. In short: the data is used for detection, stored for a defined period, and certain outputs (IDs, verification results) may be exposed to server moderators as part of normal operation [1].
3. Safety claims, encryption, and limits of those assurances
Double Counter repeatedly emphasizes encryption and automated processing to reduce human access to raw data, and it offers deletion and GDPR‑style rights via its support avenues [1]. That provides a baseline technical and legal posture for safety, but privacy researchers and bloggers warn that “reasonable security measures” are not absolute—no storage/transmission method is 100% secure—and policies can change [4]. The company’s assurances mitigate some risks but do not eliminate them, and the API/Discord ecosystem means some identifying outputs are inherently shareable by design [1] [5] [4].
4. Criticisms, alleged misuse, and alternative viewpoints
Independent critique from security and privacy advocates argues Double Counter effectively functions as a large cross‑server linkage service and that features like Doogle or Lens expose linked accounts—criticisms include claims of GDPR violations, public or paid access to linked profiles, and anecdotal oversharing in community channels [2]. Supporters and many community guides counter that reputable verification bots (including Double Counter) are widely used and necessary for server safety, and that legitimate bots disclose data practices and provide settings to opt in/out or delete data [6] [7]. Both sides are documented: company policy and promotional materials versus investigative posts alleging data exposure or commercialization of linkages [1] [3] [2] [6].
5. Practical implications for server admins and users
Server operators who prioritize anti‑raid and alt‑detection will find Double Counter’s IP/fingerprint approach effective and convenient, but must accept that verification results and account linkages can be visible to moderators or premium subscribers and that the bot stores identifying data for up to two years [1] [7]. Privacy‑conscious communities should weigh that against alternatives, read the bot’s policy carefully, implement transparency for members, and use opt‑out/deletion commands where offered [1] [6]. The Discord platform itself permits third‑party bots and sets its own controls, so some exposure arises from the platform model as well [5].
6. Verdict and reporting limitations
The most defensible conclusion from available documents is that Double Counter does store IP addresses and device/browser fingerprints, uses them to link accounts and detect VPNs, encrypts and automates processing, and retains linkage data up to 24 months while surfacing verification outputs to server moderators or premium users [1] [3]. Serious allegations that the service “sells” linkages or routinely publishes private profiles come from independent critics and require corroboration beyond the blog post cited here; the company’s public policy denies selling/ sharing stored personal data but admits certain visibility of IDs through its reporting features [1] [2]. Reported safety therefore depends on whether the stated safeguards and governance are trusted and enforced in practice; if enforcement or transparency lapses, privacy harms are plausible [1] [2] [4].