Has Elon Musk ever filed patents related to medical devices or urology?

Checked on January 30, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Elon Musk has been named on and associated with patent filings in technology areas that include medical devices—most notably patents tied to Neuralink’s brain–machine interfaces—so reporting supports that he has patent assets connected to implantable neurotechnology [1] [2] [3]. The sources reviewed do not document any patents filed by Musk that relate specifically to urology; reporting about his patent portfolio and Neuralink centers on neural implants, brain–computer interfaces, and related software and methods [1] [2] [4].

1. Musk’s patent footprint: corporate breadth, individual name

Databases compiled by patent aggregators list Elon Musk as an inventor on a range of filings and granted patents across multiple domains, and a Justia search returns patent applications and patents submitted under his name [1], while commercial IP analyses show Musk’s portfolio spans vehicle design, geospatial tech and other areas [5]. Industry commentators have noted an apparent gap between Musk’s public pronouncements about patents and the reality that Musk and his companies do use patent filings as part of their IP strategies [6] [7].

2. Neuralink: the medical-device patents that exist in reporting

Coverage of Neuralink—Musk’s neurotechnology company—explicitly describes the firm as owning and filing numerous patent assets for implantable brain–computer interface devices, associated software, signal‑decoding methods, stimulation and recording hardware, and use cases framed as medical treatments for neurological impairment [2] [4]. Legal and trade reporting states Neuralink is the assignee of several patents relating to brain‑machine interface technology and that the company’s filings are concentrated on implanted devices adapted to stimulate/record neural activity and on methods for treatment and communication [3] [2].

3. Regulatory milestones tied to Neuralink’s device strengthen the “medical device” characterization

Regulatory and industry pieces confirm the FDA has treated Neuralink’s implant as a Class III medical device and that the company obtained FDA clearance to begin human trials—events that align with a patent portfolio developed around an implantable medical product rather than a purely consumer gadget [3] [8]. Medical-device press coverage highlights Neuralink’s patents and the company’s PRIME clinical study as evidence the technology is being pursued as a therapeutic/medical system [8].

4. No substantive reporting found of urology-related patents by Musk or Neuralink

Across the assembled sources there are repeated references to brain‑computer interfaces, neural implants and related software and method claims [2] [4] [9], but none of the documents included here identify patents or patent applications by Musk or his affiliated companies that concern urology, urinary devices, or prostate/bladder treatments. The absence of such claims in these sources means there is no documented evidence in this reporting that Musk has filed patents specifically in urology [1] [2] [3].

5. Why some narratives conflate medical patents and broader ambitions

Public fascination with Musk’s “telepathy” trademarks and grand statements about human enhancement can blur the distinction between medical-device patents and speculative future features; Wired reports on Neuralink trademark filings for names like “Telepathy” but reminds readers trademarks are broader and more speculative than patents, while patent analyses concentrate on concrete implant hardware, software and method claims [10] [2]. Additionally, commentators note Musk’s rhetoric about openness and patents can obscure that his ventures still amass and rely on IP portfolios for competitive and regulatory reasons [6] [7].

6. Bottom line

The reporting establishes that Elon Musk—through Neuralink and as an inventor listed in patent databases—has been involved in filings connected to medical devices, specifically implantable brain‑computer interface technologies and their methods [1] [2] [3]. There is no evidence in the provided sources that he has filed patents related to urology; the reviewed documents instead focus on neural implants, signal processing and related therapeutic use cases [2] [4]. If a search for Musk‑filed patents in urology is required, primary patent databases and USPTO assignment records should be consulted directly because the sources here do not address that niche beyond showing no coverage of it [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What patents has Neuralink filed and what do their claims cover?
Which companies besides Neuralink hold patents for brain‑computer interfaces and how do their claims differ?
How can one search the USPTO or global patent databases to verify whether an individual has filed patents in a specific medical specialty like urology?