How many total images and videos does grok produce per day (best guess if not available). Not per user but total.
Executive summary
A defensible lower bound is that Grok-generated images alone were being posted to X at roughly 6,700 per hour in a monitored 24‑hour window—about 160,800 images/day—according to Los Angeles Times reporting . Beyond that, public metrics for total Grok activity (queries per day, active users) exist in secondary reporting but no authoritative company-published daily image/video total was found in the available reporting, so the final answer is an informed estimate built on documented minimums and plausible usage scenarios [1] [2] [3].
1. Documented minimum: what was observed on X over 24 hours
A concrete data point comes from the Los Angeles Times analysis that found the @Grok account posted images identified as sexually suggestive or “nudifying” at about 6,700 per hour during a 24‑hour sample, which equates to roughly 160,800 such images in that day and establishes a documented floor for image output observed on X .
2. Platform scale that constrains estimates
Several reports place Grok’s scale in the millions of users and hundreds of millions of daily interactions: one aggregation cites roughly 134 million queries per day [1], others report daily active user figures in the several‑million range and traffic spikes after major model updates (6.7 million DAU and 202.7 million visits at peak months are reported) [3] [2]. Those traffic numbers show the service has capacity and demand that could support millions of image/video generations per day, but they do not directly translate into media outputs without usage composition data [1] [3].
3. Limits, product features and moderation shape production but are opaque
Public writeups about Grok Imagine and Supergrok discuss daily generation caps, tiered limits, and content modes (including a controversial “spicy” mode), but these pieces do not publish an aggregate platform-wide daily production figure; they instead focus on per-user limits and moderation implications [4] [5]. Because xAI’s official per-day totals for images and videos are not in the reporting provided, any global total requires combining observed minimums with scenario assumptions grounded in documented user activity and reported caps [4] [5].
4. Two plausible estimation approaches and their outputs
Using conservative, evidence-anchored logic yields a narrow floor and a wider likely range: the LA Times posting rate gives the floor around 160,800 images/day on X alone . If one uses the 134 million daily queries figure as context and assumes even a modest 1–3% of queries are image/video generation requests (an assumption not provided in the sources), that implies roughly 1.34–4.02 million image/video generations per day; alternatively, taking DAU estimates (roughly 6–8 million daily active users reported) and assuming 0.1–0.5 image/video requests per active user per day yields roughly 600,000–4,000,000 generations per day [1] [2] [3]. These ranges are illustrative and explicitly rest on assumptions about user behavior that the sourced reporting does not confirm [1] [2] [3].
5. Reasoned best guess and confidence statement
Synthesizing the documented floor (≈160,800/day posted to X), the platform scale signals (millions of users, ~134M queries/day), and typical proportions of multimedia usage on comparable consumer AI apps, the best single estimate is that Grok produces on the order of 1–4 million images and videos per day across its services—certainly at least several hundred thousand (the observed X posts) and plausibly in the low millions if image/video generation comprises a small but nontrivial share of total queries [1] [2] [3]. Confidence is medium‑low because xAI has not supplied official aggregate media‑generation totals in the reporting provided and third‑party tallies rely on traffic and survey proxies rather than direct publish counts [4] [5].
6. Alternative interpretations and what would change the estimate
If Grok’s image/video features are heavily throttled by per‑user daily caps or if the majority of users stick to text queries, the true total could be closer to the documented floor (~160k/day) [4] [5]. Conversely, if Grok Imagine/Supergrok adoption is concentrated among power users or integrated into workflow automation, per‑user generation rates could push totals well above the low‑millions range; confirmation would require either xAI disclosure or large‑sample telemetry analyses not present in the cited reporting [4] [5].