How does the app factually work

Are you looking for more information regarding Factually? Check out our FAQ!

Still have questions? Reach out!

Checked on December 6, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

This question — “How does the app factually work” — lacks a named app, so available sources discuss broad app-platform mechanics and 2025 app trends rather than a single product. Platforms like Apple and Microsoft are introducing system-level changes (e.g., default app support, store and payment rules) that reshape how apps operate and are distributed [1] [2] [3]. Industry coverage shows developers moving toward AI, wearables, cross‑platform frameworks, and new store experiences that change how apps are built, monetized, and discovered [4] [5] [6] [7]. (Most directly relevant: Apple’s platform updates and store policy notes [1] [2].)

1. Why the question is underspecified — name, platform, or function matters

An app’s factual operation depends on three concrete things: the specific app’s architecture (native vs. web vs. hybrid), the platform rules that constrain it, and the features it uses (AI, cloud streaming, payments). The supplied reporting emphasizes platform-level changes — for example, Apple’s new OS features and developer requirements — not a single app’s internals, so a factual “how it works” answer requires the app name and target OS to cite accurately [1] [2].

2. Platform rules and SDK requirements that shape how apps function

Apple has mandatory build and storefront rules that force how apps are packaged, distributed, and paid. As of 2025 Apple requires apps uploaded to App Store Connect to be built with Xcode 16 or later using iOS 18 SDKs [1]. That kind of requirement determines what APIs an app can use, which affects runtime behavior and capabilities [1]. Apple’s release notes also highlight system-level features — translation, visual intelligence, and new interaction models — which apps can leverage if built against the supported SDKs [2].

3. App discovery, store features and monetization are evolving and affect “how an app works” for users

Changes in store functionality alter user flows: Microsoft added a full Store and Wishlist into its Xbox app beta so users can browse and save games on the go, a change that shifts discovery and purchase flows from desktop/console to mobile [3]. Apple’s App Store pricing and storefront adjustments (e.g., currency conversions, subscription rules) directly affect how purchases and payments are presented to users and how developers configure their in‑app offers [1].

4. Common technical architectures and tradeoffs reported in 2025

Journalistic and industry sources summarize three dominant architectures: native (platform-specific), cross‑platform frameworks (Flutter, React Native, Kotlin Multiplatform), and progressive web apps (PWAs). Cross‑platform tools let developers reuse code for web and mobile, but reports note PWAs remain constrained on iOS with limited access to Bluetooth, push, and background sync — limitations that change app capabilities compared with native builds [5] [6]. Developers choose architecture based on required native features, performance, and distribution needs [5] [6].

5. Feature trends that determine what an app can actually do

AI/ML, wearables, AR/VR, 5G, and multimodal inputs are the capabilities reshaping app functionality in 2025. Multiple sources show developers integrating AI and ML for smarter experiences and designing more apps for wearables and AR/VR; Apple’s platform updates added visual intelligence and Live Translation features that apps can integrate or compete with [2] [4] [7]. Faster networks and cloud services also permit real‑time streaming or low latency interactions that change app architectures [8] [7].

6. User experience and retention — why “how it works” includes design and business signals

Industry commentary emphasizes that UX and micro‑interactions determine whether an app feels to users like it “works” well; over 80% of users abandoning poor experiences is cited as a trend driver, pushing developers toward streamlined, human‑centered design [9]. App Store awards and platform curation further influence what features developers prioritize to be discoverable and retained [10] [11].

7. Conflicting perspectives and limitations in the reporting

Sources agree that AI and cross‑platform approaches are rising [7] [5], but they diverge on PWA viability: some predict growth while others point to persistent iOS limitations that marginalize PWAs [6] [5]. Reporting catalogs platform policy shifts (Apple, Microsoft) but does not include a single-app technical breakdown; therefore, detailed claims about any unnamed app’s APIs, data flows, or privacy behavior are not found in current reporting and cannot be asserted (not found in current reporting).

8. What I would need to answer the question precisely

To describe “how the app factually works” you must provide: the app’s name, the platform (iOS, Android, web, Xbox), and which features you care about (authentication, payments, offline use, cloud streaming, AI). With that I can map the app’s likely architecture and cite the platform requirements, SDK features, and policy effects from the sources above [1] [2] [3] [5] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What data sources and APIs does the app use to retrieve information?
How does the app process and verify facts before displaying them?
What machine learning or rule-based models power the app's fact-checking?
How does the app handle user-reported errors or conflicting claims?
What privacy policies and data retention practices does the app follow?