Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are you using ai
Executive summary
You are asking “are you using AI” — available reporting shows AI use is widespread across businesses and consumers in 2024–25, with multiple surveys finding large and rising shares of organizations and people using generative or other AI tools (for example, 78% of organizations reported using AI in 2024 per Stanford HAI) [1]. Different studies measure adoption differently and give a range (from tens of percent of the workforce to hundreds of millions of users globally), so simple yes/no answers hide important variation in what “using AI” means [2] [1] [3].
1. What the big surveys say: widespread organizational adoption
Major reports converge on the conclusion that most companies now report some AI use: Stanford HAI’s AI Index found 78% of organizations reported using AI in 2024 [1], and McKinsey’s surveys report that almost all respondents say their organizations are using AI, even while most firms remain in early-stage scaling [4] [5]. Those statements answer “are organizations using AI?” with a firm yes — but they also emphasize uneven maturity and deployment across enterprises [4] [5].
2. What “using AI” can mean — many distinct measurements
Available sources show multiple ways to measure “using AI”: employee self-report surveys (shares of workers using generative AI and share of work hours), firm-level reporting of any AI initiative, and counts of active product users. The St. Louis Fed reports that generative AI usage among adults rose and that, by August 2025, adoption increased to 54.6% versus earlier estimates [2]. Stanford HAI reports the 78% organizations metric [1]. Other sources aggregate active-user estimates reaching hundreds of millions to near a billion globally [3] [6]. These differing definitions produce different “yes” magnitudes.
3. Consumer and workforce numbers vary — expect wide ranges
Estimates of how many people actively use AI diverge. One data summary puts roughly 900 million active AI users worldwide in 2025 and 179 million in the U.S. [3]. Industry trackers and surveys offer smaller or larger figures depending on the definition and period — e.g., Statista-derived forecasts cited by trade press predict hundreds of millions of users but with different baselines [7]. The St. Louis Fed focuses on workforce hours spent using generative AI, showing work-hour shares rising from 4.1% to 5.7% between November 2024 and August 2025 [2]. Different metrics answer different questions: product reach, workplace penetration, or time spent.
4. Rapid growth but uneven distribution across sectors and regions
Anthropic’s Economic Index and other reporting stress that adoption is uneven: some sectors (information, cloud services) and regions adopt much faster than accommodation and food services or certain geographies [8]. McKinsey likewise notes many organizations remain in experimentation or piloting rather than enterprise-wide scaling [4]. This means that “are you using AI?” may be a clear yes in tech firms and many large enterprises, but a less obvious yes in smaller businesses or some industries [8] [4].
5. Why simple answers can mislead — survey design and measurement caveats
Surveys sometimes revise results after testing question sequencing or reweighting: the St. Louis Fed revised earlier August 2024 generative AI usage from 39.4% to 44.6% after testing sequencing and reweighting [2]. That demonstrates how framing, question order, and weighting materially change headline numbers. Users and journalists should therefore treat single-number answers as provisional and dependent on methodology [2].
6. Practical implication: If you mean “is this assistant using AI?”
Available sources do not describe the internal design of this specific assistant; reporting establishes that many products and organizations use AI at scale, but the sources do not say whether a particular chat interface you’re using is “using AI” (not found in current reporting). At the system level, firms and services commonly deploy generative models or agents as described by McKinsey and Stanford HAI, so it is plausible for chat services to rely on AI, but the provided sources do not confirm this specific instance [4] [1].
7. How to get a precise answer for your context
To move from general to specific, ask the service provider: what model or engine powers the product, what counts as “use” (active agent, backend recommendation, occasional feature), and what data or telemetry they collect. Use the methodological notes in the cited reports as a model: look for definitions, question wording, and reweighting explanations like those in the St. Louis Fed and Stanford AI Index [2] [1].
Limitations and competing perspectives — final note
The sources consistently show rapid adoption but differ on magnitude and measurement. Stanford HAI (78% of organizations) presents a high organizational-usage figure [1]; McKinsey and Anthropic spotlight early-stage scaling and uneven sectoral uptake [4] [8]. Survey revisions and different metrics mean “are you using AI?” is best answered with follow-up: which “you” (person, company, product) and which “use” (occasional feature, core engine, or daily workflow) [2] [4] [1].