How do ISPs log and retain IP assignment records, and how long are those records typically available to law enforcement?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Internet service providers (ISPs log which subscriber received which public IP address at what time, but retention practices are inconsistent: some carriers keep those DHCP/IP-assignment logs for only months while others retain them for a year or more, and national laws sometimes mandate longer periods like two years in certain countries (or have tried to) [1] [2] [3]. Whether law enforcement can get those records and for how long depends on a mix of company policy, the underlying technology (dynamic vs. static addressing), and national or regional data‑retention laws that vary widely [4] [5].
1. How ISPs record IP assignments: the mechanics behind the log
When a customer’s device connects to the internet the ISP’s network issues a public-facing IP and records that assignment—often in DHCP, PPPoE, or carrier NAT logs—so the company can bill, troubleshoot, and route traffic; those logs tie a time window to an account and are the principal record law enforcement seeks to map an IP observed in an investigation to a subscriber [4] [6].
2. Why retention varies: business needs, technical scale, and cost
ISPs say they keep IP‑assignment logs only as long as necessary for operational reasons—billing disputes, abuse complaints, or network diagnostics—and the practical costs and engineering challenges of storing per-minute address swaps at scale mean many providers routinely purge older logs unless required otherwise [2] [4].
3. The real-world range: months to years, with public examples
Because there’s no uniform U.S. mandate, retention ranges widely: leaked or litigated documents have shown Comcast using a roughly 180‑day policy in some contexts and Verizon retaining certain IP assignment records for up to 18 months, while other providers have cited roughly six months to a year; cases have been dismissed when logs exceeded a provider’s retention window and were no longer available [1].
4. Law and policy that change the default: mandatory retention regimes
Where governments legislate retention—Europe’s now-invalidated Data Retention Directive and Australia’s two‑year mandate are prominent examples—ISPs are compelled to store allocations and other telecom metadata for fixed periods and make it accessible to authorities, a shift privacy advocates like the EFF warn is invasive and costly [3] [5]. In the U.S., proposals and hearings have discussed two‑year rules in the past but no equivalent nationwide mandate exists, leaving retention largely to providers unless local law requires otherwise [2] [3].
5. How law enforcement obtains logs and the legal threshold
Investigators typically subpoena or seek a court order to compel an ISP to produce subscriber‑IP mapping; the precise legal process depends on jurisdiction and the type of data, but the practical effect is the same: if the ISP still holds the mapping for the relevant timestamp, it can identify the subscriber, and if it has deleted or anonymized the record under its retention policy, investigators may have no recourse [2] [7].
6. Limits, evasions, and technical caveats that complicate identification
Dynamic addressing, carrier‑grade NAT, very short lease times (sometimes measured in minutes), and practices like anonymization or deletion mean that an IP→person linkage is not always simple or possible; policy proposals often underestimate these technical realities and storing every ephemeral swap would create enormous data volumes and reliability problems [4] [1].
7. The politics and competing agendas behind retention debates
Privacy advocates frame mandatory retention as mass surveillance and security risk; law enforcement frames it as essential for investigations; ISPs push back on cost, complexity, and customer trust—each side has clear incentives that shape reporting and legislation, and readers should note those institutional agendas when assessing claims from any single source [5] [2].
8. Bottom line for investigations: availability windows are uneven and jurisdictional
If an investigator needs to tie an IP to a user, success hinges on whether the ISP’s retention window still covers the incident date and jurisdictional rules that permit compelled disclosure; common practical windows in available reporting run from about six months up to 18–24 months in some cases, but there is no universal answer without checking the specific provider and local law [1] [2] [3].