Is there a list of AI youtubers ?
Executive summary
There is no single, authoritative "official" list, but many curated lists of AI YouTubers exist across blogs, aggregator sites and influencer databases — from short top-10 roundups to large directories claiming 100+ channels [1] [2]. Those lists vary by purpose, scope and motive, so a reader seeking a reliable compilation must choose between educational curation, influencer marketing databases, or journalistic roundups and treat each accordingly [3] [4].
1. Yes — dozens of curated lists are publicly available
Multiple outlets publish compilations of AI-focused YouTube channels: industry blogs and educational outlets offer "top 10" or "best of" roundups (for example Skim AI’s top-ten list and DigitalOcean’s educational picks) that highlight prominent creators and channels aimed at learners and practitioners [1] [3]. Aggregator sites and influencer platforms provide larger catalogs — Feedspot advertises lists like "100 AI YouTubers" while Heepsy markets monthly-updated influencer leaderboards for campaigns [2] [4]. These sources demonstrate that lists exist in many sizes and formats rather than one canonical dataset [2] [4].
2. The lists differ by intent: education, news, creative demos, or marketing
Educational roundups (DigitalOcean, KDnuggets) assemble channels focused on tutorials, research explainers and course-style content for learners and engineers [3] [5]. Media or curator sites (Analytics Vidhya, HyperwriteAI) produce influencer-style recommendations highlighting personalities like Lex Fridman or Robert Miles for broader audiences [6] [7] [8]. Marketing-oriented platforms (Feedspot, Heepsy) compile contactable influencer databases aimed at outreach and brand deals, often emphasizing follower counts and engagement metrics rather than pedagogical quality [2] [4]. The source determines the selection criteria and therefore the utility of its list [2] [3].
3. Quality and bias are built into curation — check the criteria
Most published lists do not apply a universal standard; instead they rank channels by popularity, educational value, topical focus, or commercial metrics such as subscribers and engagement, which produces different "top" recommendations [2] [1]. Some lists explicitly aim to simplify complex topics for beginners while others prioritize cutting-edge research explainers or creative AI demos, so a channel flagged as essential in one list may be absent from another because of differing judgments about usefulness or audience [3] [9]. Readers should therefore scrutinize each list’s stated rationale — many sources do disclose whether they weigh subscriber counts, content depth, or influencer reach [2] [3].
4. Hidden motives: monetization, sponsorships and traffic incentives
Several curators operate with commercial incentives: influencer directories sell contact lists or premium exports for outreach, and some blog roundups are structured to attract traffic and affiliate revenue, which can skew inclusion toward channels with stronger brandability rather than purely educational merit [2] [10]. Even ostensibly educational lists can amplify creators who fit a site’s audience profile or partnerships, so assuming neutrality without verification risks following a list optimized for engagement or monetization rather than accuracy [2] [10].
5. Practical guidance: how to find or build the right list for the need
For learners seeking rigorous tutorials, consult educational roundups and institutional or technical channels noted by DigitalOcean and KDnuggets; for current AI news and discussions, curated top-10 lists like Skim AI or niche blogs highlight commentators and analysts [3] [5] [1]. For outreach or campaign work, platforms like Feedspot and Heepsy supply larger, regularly updated influencer databases with contact and engagement metrics, though those services typically commercialize access [2] [4]. No single source covers every creator: many smaller or specialized channels appear on niche lists (e.g., creative AI, entrepreneurship, or research explainers), so triangulating two or more lists produces the most comprehensive view [11] [9].
Conclusion
A definitive, single-list "answer" does not exist in the sense of a universal, authoritative registry, but abundant curated lists do exist and are fit for different purposes — education, news, creative exploration, or influencer outreach — each bringing selection criteria and potential bias that must be evaluated against the user’s goals [2] [3] [4].