Fact check: Are the videos with Maya Angelou's voice fake

1. Summary of the results

The authenticity of videos with Maya Angelou's voice is a topic of inquiry, with various analyses providing insights into this issue. Initially, sources such as ^[1], ^[2], and ^[3] do not provide any information about the authenticity of these videos, instead focusing on Maya Angelou's life, work, and legacy ^[1], or appearing to be summaries or previews of videos about her life and work ^[2], or providing links and information about the PBS News Hour, including a clip about Maya Angelou's iconic voice ^[3]. However, other analyses shed more light on the topic. According to ^[4], people cannot reliably detect deepfakes and are biased towards guessing that videos are authentic, which could lead to the spread of misinformation ^[4]. Furthermore, ^[5] highlights the challenges of detecting deepfakes and the potential consequences of their spread, emphasizing the need for more research on the human side of deepfake detection ^[5]. On the other hand, sources like ^[6] suggest that the videos with Maya Angelou's voice are not fake, but rather an AI-generated recreation of her voice, as part of the Maya Angelou AI Immersive Experience ^[6]. This is further supported by ^[7], which confirms that the videos are AI-generated recreations, developed in collaboration with CMG Worldwide and other partners, to bring her writing and ideas to life in a unique way ^[7]. The key finding is that the videos in question are likely AI-generated recreations of Maya Angelou's voice, rather than traditional deepfakes.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A crucial aspect missing from the original statement is the context of the Maya Angelou AI Immersive Experience, which is essential to understanding the nature of the videos with her voice. Sources like ^[6] and ^[7] provide this context, explaining that the videos are AI-generated recreations, not deepfakes ^{[6] [7]}. Another missing viewpoint is the technical aspect of deepfake detection, which sources like ^[4] and ^[5] touch upon, highlighting the challenges and biases involved in detecting deepfakes ^{[4] [5]}. Additionally, the perspective of the creators of the Maya Angelou AI Immersive Experience is important, as they likely have insights into the development and intentions behind the AI-generated videos. The benefits of considering these alternative viewpoints include a more comprehensive understanding of the issue and the ability to make informed judgments about the authenticity of the videos. For instance, the creators of the experience may benefit from the positive reception of their work, while the public may benefit from a deeper understanding of the technology and its applications.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or biased because it implies that the videos with Maya Angelou's voice are deepfakes, which could lead to unnecessary concern or skepticism about the authenticity of these videos. However, as sources like ^[6] and ^[7] clarify, the videos are actually AI-generated recreations, not deepfakes ^{[6] [7]}. This distinction is crucial, as it changes the context and implications of the videos. The potential beneficiaries of this framing include those who seek to sensationalize the issue of deepfakes, while those who may be harmed by this framing include the creators of the Maya Angelou AI Immersive Experience and the public, who may be misled or confused by the implication that the videos are deepfakes. It is essential to approach this topic with a nuanced understanding, considering the complexities of AI-generated content and the intentions behind its creation ^{[6] [7]}.