Fact check: Do any plausible conditions exist in which midjourney would begin supporting NSFW content?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available evidence, no plausible conditions currently exist for Midjourney to begin supporting NSFW content. The platform maintains an extremely strict anti-NSFW policy that is deeply embedded in its operational framework.

Midjourney's community guidelines explicitly require all content to be "Safe For Work" (SFW) and the platform operates under an "open-by-default" model that necessitates this restriction ^[1]. The company has implemented multiple layers of content moderation, including traditional banned-word lists and AI-powered moderation systems to prevent NSFW content creation ^[2].

The platform has gone to extraordinary lengths to prevent adult content, including banning words related to human reproductive biology to avoid generating shocking or inappropriate material ^[3]. This comprehensive filtering system includes a multi-layered approach with banned words and sophisticated content detection ^[4].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual factors that complicate the NSFW policy landscape:

• User frustration with over-moderation: Many users report that Midjourney's moderation system is overly sensitive, flagging innocent prompts as NSFW and hampering legitimate artistic creation ^[2]. Some users have canceled their subscriptions specifically due to the platform's "puritanical" moderation system ^[5].
• Accidental NSFW generation: Despite strict guidelines, Midjourney's AI has been documented accidentally creating NSFW content through seemingly innocent prompts like "beach party" when users employ the platform's "Variation" feature multiple times ^[6]. This suggests the technology itself may have inherent challenges with content control.
• Community dissatisfaction: There is documented user frustration with Midjourney's censorship policies on platforms like Reddit, though no indication exists that company representatives plan to change their stance ^[7].

Potential beneficiaries of maintaining strict NSFW policies include:

• Midjourney's corporate partnerships and mainstream market positioning
• Regulatory compliance in various jurisdictions
• Brand safety for commercial applications

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains no explicit misinformation but demonstrates a lack of awareness regarding the depth of Midjourney's commitment to NSFW restrictions. The question implies that "plausible conditions" might exist, when the evidence suggests the opposite.

The framing potentially underestimates:

• The comprehensive nature of Midjourney's multi-layered filtering system ^{[2] [4]}
• The explicit policy statements in official community guidelines ^[1]
• The proactive measures the company has taken, including banning reproductive biology terminology ^[3]

The question may reflect wishful thinking from users frustrated with current restrictions rather than realistic assessment of corporate policy direction, given that user complaints about over-moderation have not resulted in policy changes ^{[5] [7]}.