Fact check: If there is sufficient demand could midjourney begin to support NSFW content?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Midjourney has explicitly positioned itself as a Safe For Work (SFW) platform that does not support NSFW content, regardless of demand. The platform's Community Guidelines explicitly mandate that all content must be 'Safe For Work,' disallowing erotic, violent, or otherwise disturbing imagery ^[1]. This policy is enforced through multiple mechanisms:

• Multi-layered content filtering: Midjourney has implemented both traditional banned-word lists and AI-powered moderation systems to prevent NSFW content generation ^[1]
• Extensive word blocking: The platform bans a wide range of words related to the human reproductive system to prevent shocking or gory content ^[2]
• Comprehensive prohibited content list: Banned topics include explicit sexual content, nudity, violence, hate speech, and fetishistic themes ^{[3] [4]}

The platform operates as an "open-by-default community" that requires all content to remain within SFW boundaries ^[5]. While some users have expressed interest in NSFW capabilities, discussions acknowledge the potential risks and legal issues associated with such content ^[6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks several important contextual factors:

• Legal and regulatory considerations: The analyses don't fully explore the complex legal landscape surrounding AI-generated NSFW content, including potential liability issues and varying international regulations that could influence Midjourney's decision-making
• Business model implications: Midjourney would benefit financially from maintaining its current SFW stance as it allows broader corporate adoption and advertising partnerships that might be jeopardized by NSFW content
• Technical workarounds: Some users have found ways to create "artistic and suggestive graphics without breaching NSFW bounds" while still adhering to community guidelines ^[7], suggesting there's a gray area between completely safe and explicitly NSFW content
• Competitive landscape: The question doesn't consider how other AI image generators handle NSFW content and whether market pressure might influence Midjourney's position
• Copyright concerns: Midjourney faces ongoing controversy regarding its use of copyrighted artwork for training, which may influence its approach to content policies ^[8]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains an implicit assumption that sufficient demand could drive policy changes at Midjourney. This framing is potentially misleading because:

• It ignores stated company values: The question assumes demand is the primary factor, when Midjourney has explicitly positioned itself as a SFW community regardless of user requests ^{[1] [5]}
• It overlooks technical architecture: The platform has invested significantly in multi-layered NSFW prevention systems ^[1], suggesting a fundamental architectural commitment to SFW content rather than a simple policy choice
• It minimizes legal and business considerations: The question focuses solely on demand without acknowledging the complex legal, regulatory, and business factors that likely influence content policies more than user requests

The phrasing suggests that content policies are primarily market-driven, when the evidence indicates Midjourney has made a strategic decision to maintain SFW boundaries as a core platform principle.