Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: New era Protect works
1. Summary of the results
The analyses reveal that "new era Protect works" appears to reference two distinct products with similar names:
ERA Protect Alarm System: This is a smart home security system that receives mixed but generally positive reviews. The system has a 3.9/5 rating on Trustpilot and is described as having "ease of installation" and "helpfulness of the technical support team" [1]. However, customers have experienced "issues with the fingerprint sensor, the app, and the locking mechanism" [1]. The system offers "optional professional monitoring" and a "decent collection of sensors and cameras," though it has integration limitations with "security cameras and keypads that cannot be controlled from the app" [2] [3].
NewEra Protect Supplement: This is a "natural dietary supplement designed to support urinary health and hormonal balance in women" [4]. The product is manufactured in an "FDA-approved manufacturing facility" and contains "clinically-backed natural ingredients" [5] [4]. The supplement comes with a "60-day money-back guarantee" and is positioned as supporting "healthy metabolism" and general wellness [4] [5].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement lacks crucial specificity about which product is being referenced. Several important contextual elements are missing:
- Product differentiation: The analyses show these are completely different products - a security system versus a dietary supplement - yet the statement treats them as one entity.
- Effectiveness limitations: For the alarm system, the analyses note "some drawbacks, including a fiddly keypad and limited integration" which "may make it less desirable for some users" [3]. For the supplement, sources acknowledge that "individual results may vary" [4].
- Commercial interests: The supplement analyses come from promotional sources that would benefit financially from positive coverage. Companies manufacturing and selling these products have clear financial incentives to emphasize positive aspects while downplaying limitations.
- Regulatory context: While the supplement is noted as being from an "FDA-approved manufacturing facility" [4], this doesn't constitute FDA approval of the product's effectiveness claims.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The statement "new era Protect works" presents several concerning elements:
- Oversimplification: The statement makes an absolute claim without acknowledging the mixed reviews and limitations documented in the analyses. The alarm system has "some issues" [1] and integration problems [2], while supplement effectiveness varies by individual [4].
- Lack of specificity: By not clearly identifying which product is being discussed, the statement could mislead consumers into conflating two entirely different products with different functions and effectiveness profiles.
- Promotional language: The definitive claim that the product "works" mirrors marketing language rather than balanced assessment. The analyses show both products have limitations and mixed user experiences that contradict such absolute statements.
- Source reliability concerns: Some analyses appear to come from promotional or commercial sources [4] [5] rather than independent reviews, suggesting potential bias in the underlying information being referenced.