Fact check: An example of workload optimisation on PC is: NVMe SSD for active files and projects, SATA SSDs for programs and softwares and HDD for backup and archiving.

1. Summary of the results

1. Summary of the results

The suggested storage configuration represents a general optimization approach, but modern storage solutions have evolved beyond this simple categorization. While NVMe SSDs indeed offer the highest performance for active files, and HDDs remain cost-effective for backups, the distinction between NVMe and SATA SSDs for programs is less relevant in current computing environments.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

• NVMe technology now offers 25x more data transfer than SATA, making SATA SSDs increasingly obsolete for program storage
• Performance differences between storage types are often minimal at low queue depths, which is typical for everyday computing tasks
• Specific hardware examples were omitted: Crucial T705 and Corsair MP600 Elite for NVMe, and Seagate Exos X20 for HDD storage
• The statement doesn't address crucial maintenance factors like SSD optimization, firmware updates, and drive health monitoring
• Cost per terabyte considerations are not mentioned, which is a critical factor in storage decisions

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

• The statement presents SATA SSDs as an optimal choice for programs, while current technology trends show NVMe is becoming the standard protocol in both consumer and enterprise environments
• The rigid categorization suggests clear-cut use cases, when in reality, storage needs vary significantly based on individual workloads and budget constraints
• The statement overlooks the importance of regular maintenance and optimization practices that are crucial for maintaining SSD performance
• Hardware manufacturers who still produce SATA SSDs would benefit from perpetuating the notion that SATA drives remain optimal for program storage, despite NVMe's superior performance characteristics