Are there forks or alternative privacy-focused Android projects replacing GrapheneOS?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
GrapheneOS remains the most security‑hardened, Pixel‑focused privacy Android build in current reporting, and there is no clear, widely‑reported fork that replaces it with equivalent device support or the same security posture [1] [2]. Multiple alternatives and competitors exist — notably CalyxOS, /e/OS, LineageOS, DivestOS and traditional Linux mobile projects — but coverage treats them as alternatives with different tradeoffs rather than direct GrapheneOS forks that "replace" it [3] [4] [5].
1. What “replacing GrapheneOS” would mean — and why no simple swap exists
Replacing GrapheneOS requires more than a similar UI or de‑googled apps: it demands the same kernel hardening, exploit mitigations, device attestation tools and a trusted engineering team able to port and maintain security patches for supported hardware. Reporting underscores GrapheneOS’s deep technical hardening and project‑specific tools like its Auditor app and other security‑focused components, which are not trivially reproduced by general Android forks [1]. Available sources do not mention any fork that has duplicated GrapheneOS’s entire security stack and official device support set.
2. Existing “alternatives” in the press — many options, different priorities
Coverage and comparison lists present CalyxOS, LineageOS, /e/OS, DivestOS and a range of Linux mobile projects as the primary alternatives for privacy‑minded users, each with different tradeoffs: CalyxOS prioritizes user convenience with microG support; LineageOS offers broad device compatibility; DivestOS focuses on older hardware and network restrictions; /e/OS provides a de‑googled experience with replacement services [3] [4] [5]. These are framed as competitors or alternatives, not forks aiming to supplant GrapheneOS’s security model [6] [7].
3. Forks and community projects: no documented GrapheneOS successor
Community forums and privacy‑guide discussions explicitly ask whether a fork exists to extend GrapheneOS’s device support (for example to non‑Pixel phones), but reporting and forum threads show no consensus or evidence of an active, well‑resourced fork that matches GrapheneOS’s security level [8]. Slashlists and alternative directories catalogue many projects as “alternatives,” but they are aggregate lists rather than evidence of a GrapheneOS fork or replacement [9] [6].
4. Why hardware support matters — Google’s Android changes increase barriers
Recent reporting documents that Android 16 and Google’s upstream changes have made porting privacy OSes harder, limiting the practical device base for projects like GrapheneOS and raising costs of hardware support and supply chains [10] [2]. GrapheneOS itself is reportedly exploring new OEM partnerships to expand beyond Pixel hardware, which underlines why a replacement fork would have to solve both firmware access and supply‑chain trust problems — not just copy code [2] [11].
5. Where niche, non‑Android mobile projects fit the map
Linux‑based mobile projects and alternative OS vendors (Sailfish, Mobian, PureOS/Purism, UBports, Jolla) are repeatedly suggested in roundups as privacy‑oriented paths away from Android entirely. These provide genuine alternatives for users willing to accept a different app ecosystem and limited mainstream app compatibility; they are not positioned as GrapheneOS forks but as separate approaches to privacy by changing the platform itself [12] [13] [14].
6. Practical advice for users seeking a “GrapheneOS replacement”
If your priority is GrapheneOS‑level hardening, current reporting advises staying with GrapheneOS on supported Pixel devices or following its announced OEM plans; no fork in public reporting yet matches its engineering focus [1] [2]. If device compatibility or convenience matters more, CalyxOS, LineageOS, /e/OS and DivestOS are viable alternatives with different balances of usability vs. security [3] [4] [5]. For those willing to leave Android, Linux mobile projects like Mobian or Sailfish offer different privacy tradeoffs [12] [14].
7. Limits of current reporting and what to watch next
Available sources document alternatives and discussions but do not report any single fork that replaces GrapheneOS in scope or security [8] [1]. Watch for announcements of sustained projects that (a) publish matching hardening work, (b) provide verifiable device support beyond Pixels, or (c) disclose funding/OEM partnerships — the three elements that would indicate a potential successor [10] [11]. Available sources do not mention any such project having emerged to date.