Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How do privacy-focused search engines in 2025 differ in tracker-blocking compared with Google and Bing?
Executive summary
Privacy-focused search engines in 2025 (like DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, Startpage, Mojeek and others) emphasize blocking third‑party trackers, not logging searches or IPs, and using contextual ads instead of profiling; reviewers repeatedly found fewer or no third‑party trackers on private search result pages compared with mainstream engines [1] [2] [3]. Mainstream players (Google, Bing) are described in the available reporting as profit-driven by targeted ads and extensive cross‑site tracking, which privacy engines explicitly avoid or limit [1] [4].
1. Tracker‑blocking: default protection vs opt‑in extensions
Privacy engines and privacy browsers ship with tracker‑blocking built in or enabled by default: DuckDuckGo’s tools and browser extensions “block third‑party trackers” and force HTTPS [5] [3], Brave’s Shields block trackers, cross‑site cookies and fingerprinting [6], and standalone services like PrivacyWall advertise anti‑tracking and ad‑blocking technology at the app or OS level [7]. By contrast, mainstream search providers rely on the browser/extension ecosystem and browser privacy settings; the articles emphasize that Google and other big tech firms are major trackers across the web [4] [1].
2. What “blocking” actually means: third‑party trackers, fingerprinting and cookies
Sources show privacy engines aim to stop the usual tracking vectors: third‑party trackers, cross‑site cookies, fingerprinting and link tracking. EFF’s Privacy Badger blocks Google/Facebook link tracking and fingerprinting, and Brave advertises randomized fingerprints and advanced fingerprinting protections that change browser signals to resist identification [4] [5]. DuckDuckGo and others claim they don’t log IPs or build user profiles, and block advertising trackers by default [8] [3].
3. Where private search differs from Google/Bing in practice
Testing cited in reviews found private search result pages often had few or no trackers to block: PCMag and SafetyDetectives noted uBlock or other blockers found trackers on DuckDuckGo results only when those trackers were from the service itself, while Brave Search yielded virtually nothing for uBlock to block in their tests [2] [3]. That contrasts with mainstream search experiences described in reporting where tracking and data capture feed targeted ads and profiling [1] [4].
4. Architectural choices: independent index, proxies and anonymization
Private engines differ in backend design. Some (Mojeek, Brave Search) use their own crawlers and indexes and thereby reduce reliance on other providers and the need to pass queries to Big Tech [3] [9]. Others (Startpage) anonymize queries and proxy them to Google to get results without exposing users’ identities — an approach that reduces direct tracking but inherits indirect dependencies on Google’s index [3]. These architectural tradeoffs affect what trackers appear on result pages and what metadata is exposed [3].
5. Business models that influence tracking
Several sources say private engines fund themselves without user profiling: DuckDuckGo uses contextual ads tied to queries rather than user profiles, and some engines eschew cookies and personalized ads entirely [1] [6]. Mainstream engines monetize heavily through user profiling and targeted advertising, which creates incentives to collect cross‑site signals [1] [4]. The differing revenue models directly explain why private engines block trackers while Google and Bing collect and reuse them.
6. User controls and extra tools: extensions, browsers and VPNs
Reviews recommend combining private search with privacy browsers, extensions and VPNs for more complete protection. DuckDuckGo provides extensions and a browser that block trackers and force HTTPS [5] [3]. EFF recommends tools like Privacy Badger to block link tracking and fingerprinting from big platforms [4]. Several analysts urge using a private search plus a VPN to hide IPs and increase anonymity because search engines alone can’t stop network‑level observation [3].
7. Limitations, tradeoffs and what the reporting doesn’t settle
Available reporting highlights fewer trackers on private search pages and stronger default protections [2] [3], but it also notes caveats: Startpage’s anonymization depends on Google’s results and could be affected by changes at Google [3], and not all private engines have equally large indexes [3]. Sources do not provide systematic, side‑by‑side lab measurements of Google/Bing result pages for 2025 within this set, so precise quantitative comparisons of tracker counts across all engines are not found in current reporting [3] [2].
Bottom line: in 2025 privacy‑focused search engines reduce on‑page and cross‑site tracking by default, avoid user profiling for ads, and bake tracker‑blocking into browsers and extensions; Google and Bing remain tied to profiling‑based ad models and cross‑site tracking practices, which is why privacy engines and third‑party blockers are repeatedly recommended by reviewers [1] [5] [2] [4].