How does Snapchat’s encryption policy for Memories and chats differ from My Eyes Only, and what official documentation supports those differences?

Checked on January 19, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Snapchat stores most user content in Memories, which are cloud‑backed and subject to Snapchat’s labeling, search, and personalization processes [1][2]; by contrast My Eyes Only is a separate, PIN‑protected section that Snapchat describes as encrypted and inaccessible without the user’s passcode — “not even us” — and unrecoverable if the passcode is lost [1][3]. Official Snapchat product pages and Help/Privacy materials frame My Eyes Only as an extra encrypted layer inside Memories, while broader claims about end‑to‑end encryption for chats or snaps are limited or qualified in outside reporting [2][4][5].

1. How Memories and chats are handled inside Snapchat — cloud backup, labeling and personalization

Memories is Snapchat’s cloud archive: content saved there is backed up online, indexed with labels and groupings so Snapchat can surface related content and help search, and it can be used to personalize the service or ads [1][2]; saved Snaps and Stories remain in Memories until manually deleted, making them persistent server‑side rather than ephemeral by default [6]. Snapchat’s public product pages explicitly state that it applies its “magic” — recognition and labeling — to Memories to enable search and personalization [1].

2. What Snapchat states about My Eyes Only — encryption, password protection, and recoverability

Snapchat’s materials present My Eyes Only as an encrypted, password‑protected folder within Memories whose contents are protected behind a user‑chosen passcode and intended to stay private even if a device is compromised [1][2]; support and community documentation repeat the company’s claim that without the My Eyes Only password “no one can view” those items, and that Snapchat cannot recover them if the password is forgotten [3]. Guides and third‑party explainers echo this framing: My Eyes Only adds an “extra layer” of protection and removes items from regular Memories to store them in a separate encrypted area [7][8].

3. Direct contrasts: encryption scope, who can access, and recoverability

The core differences are threefold in Snapchat’s own framing: scope (Memories is a general cloud archive processed by Snapchat; My Eyes Only is a subset moved into a locked folder) [1][2], access (Memories content is available to Snapchat processes like labeling and personalization, whereas My Eyes Only content is described as inaccessible without the user’s PIN and, per Snapchat, not viewable by the company) [1][3], and recoverability (Memories items can be recovered or remain on servers until deleted; My Eyes Only items are, according to Snapchat, unrecoverable by Snap if the user loses the passcode) [6][3].

4. Official documentation that supports these differences

Snapchat’s “Memories” and “Privacy by Product” pages describe how Memories are backed up, labeled, and used to personalize experiences and advertising, and they mention My Eyes Only as a feature that “lets you keep your Snaps safe and encrypted, and protected behind a password you choose” [1][2]. Community and support pages reiterate the company line that My Eyes Only content is encrypted and not recoverable by Snap without the user’s password [3]. Those Snap pages are the primary official sources in the assembled reporting for the distinction between general Memories and the My Eyes Only vault [1][2][3].

5. Caveats, third‑party reporting and forensic findings that complicate the picture

Independent reporting and security analyses complicate a simple “Memories unencrypted, MEO encrypted” narrative: Wikipedia and conference reporting note Snapchat has used limited end‑to‑end encryption historically for some snaps and has discussed expanding its use, meaning chat encryption status is nuanced and evolving [4]. Security reviewers and privacy analysts argue Snapchat’s overall encryption has weaknesses and past engineering choices left gaps [5]. Forensics practitioners report that My Eyes Only artifacts can sometimes be recovered from device caches or through specialized tools if snaps were viewed locally or extracted from device backups, indicating that practical recoverability can depend on device state and forensic capability, not just Snap’s stated policy [9]. Third‑party explainers also warn that Snapchat still collects data used for personalization and that private Memories may be subject to broader data practices unless placed in MEO [10].

6. Bottom line and limits of available public documentation

Snapchat’s official product pages and support docs draw a clear distinction: Memories are cloud‑backed and processed for features, while My Eyes Only is described as an encrypted, PIN‑protected enclave that Snap says it cannot decrypt without the user’s passcode [1][2][3]. However, public documentation from Snapchat does not fully enumerate encryption keys, technical architecture, or the precise legal/forensic limits of access, and independent analyses and forensic reports show that device‑level artifacts and historical engineering choices can blunt absolute claims about inaccessibility [4][5][9]. Therefore the policy difference is clear in Snap’s documentation, but technical and practical nuances remain visible in third‑party scrutiny.

Want to dive deeper?
Which Snapchat data types are covered by end‑to‑end encryption and where has Snap published technical details?
How have forensic tools and law‑enforcement subpoenas been used to access My Eyes Only or Memories content in practice?
What settings and user behaviors minimize the risk that Memories metadata or cached files can be accessed by third parties?