Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many U.S. states used Dominion Voting Systems in 2024?
Executive Summary
Dominion Voting Systems was reported to have been used in 27 U.S. states for the 2024 election by multiple contemporary reports; contemporaneous state-level records confirm use in some states such as California and at least individual counties in Washington and Michigan, but no single public federal registry enumerates every state’s vendor choices. The claim that Dominion operated in 27 states in 2024 is supported by reporting from fact-checkers and major outlets, and is consistent with state certification documents showing active Dominion equipment in specific states [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. How a single number became the headline — tracing the "27 states" claim
Multiple news and fact-checking pieces published around October 2024–October 2025 repeated the figure that Dominion equipment was used in 27 states during the 2024 election, with FactCheck.org explicitly stating that Dominion would operate in 27 states and noting use in Florida counties [1]. Subsequent reporting by major outlets reiterated that same total while focusing on related developments, including Dominion’s later sale to a new owner and corporate legal settlements; those stories used the 27-state figure as a baseline fact while concentrating on ownership and business changes rather than providing a state-by-state roster [5] [2]. The consistency of the number across independent reports suggests it was based on contemporaneous vendor certifications and county procurement disclosures compiled by journalists and watchdogs, though primary source lists vary by state.
2. State-level records that confirm parts of the picture — California, Washington, Michigan
Official state election offices and certification pages show concrete instances of Dominion systems in use, corroborating the broader reporting: the California Secretary of State lists approvals and certifications for Dominion Democracy Suite and ImageCast products, demonstrating active certification and likely operational deployment in that state [3]. Washington’s public county-by-county system listing documents that at least Franklin County used a Dominion Democracy Suite ICX system in the 2024 general election, indicating county-level adoption consistent with vendor diversity across states [4]. Michigan’s state materials likewise record the use of Dominion voter assist terminals and tabulators in specific counties for November 2024, illustrating that Dominion presence in 2024 was a mixture of statewide deployments and county-specific procurements [6].
3. Why different sources emphasize different angles — ownership, litigation, and misinformation
Coverage around October 2025 shifted emphasis from vendor footprint to corporate change and legal history: several articles reporting the company’s sale to a new entity and recounting Dominion’s defamation settlements with media organizations reused the 27-state deployment metric while prioritizing narratives about ownership, accountability, and market concentration [5] [2]. Fact-checkers published in late 2024 used the 27-state figure defensively to correct social-media claims that Dominion would not operate in places like Florida, pointing to Florida Department of State approvals and county equipment plans as concrete rebuttals [1]. The variation in focus shows different agendas: election-administration sources prioritize certification and compliance, fact-checkers aim to correct misinformation, and business/crime reporters foreground sales and post-2024 corporate developments [1] [5] [2].
4. What is well-documented and what remains opaque — gaps in the public record
While multiple reputable reports converged on the 27-state summary, there is no single federal registry publicly enumerating vendor use by state for 2024, and some articles citing 27 states did not list each state explicitly, leaving verification to state-by-state certification pages and county procurement records [5] [2]. State documents confirm Dominion use in specific places, but the complete, independently verifiable list of all 27 states requires compiling disparate certification and county-level disclosures. Reporting citing the 27-state number relied on aggregations that journalists compiled from these local records; the number is therefore credible and repeatedly asserted, but the underlying itemized state roster is scattered across many jurisdictional sources [3] [4].
5. How to verify the claim yourself — reliable primary documents to consult
To independently confirm the claim that Dominion was used in 27 states in 2024, consult state election office certification lists and county procurement or voting-system-by-county pages for each state (California’s certification page and Washington’s county-by-county listing are examples of primary records), then cross-reference those with contemporaneous fact-checker and news reporting that aggregated local disclosures around the 2024 election cycle [3] [4] [1]. Journalists who reported the 27-state figure drew on these public documents; recreating their audit requires systematic collection of each state’s certification or county equipment lists. The multifaceted public record explains why major outlets and fact-checkers could state the 27-state figure with confidence even when individual articles did not reproduce the full state-by-state list [1] [2].
6. Bottom line and reporting posture — what readers should take away
The preponderance of contemporary reporting and state certification documents supports the conclusion that Dominion Voting Systems was used in 27 U.S. states in 2024, but the precise state roster is dispersed across state and county records rather than centralized in a single federal list; confirming the exact list requires consulting state certification pages and county vendor disclosures. Readers should treat the 27-state figure as a well-supported summary reported by fact-checkers and major news outlets while recognizing that the source-level proof is distributed across many jurisdictional records and that later corporate changes to Dominion’s ownership do not retroactively alter which jurisdictions used its systems in 2024 [1] [3] [4].