Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does using Tor and VPN together affect internet speed?
Executive Summary
Using Tor and a VPN together predictably reduces internet speed because traffic must traverse additional encryption and routing layers; the magnitude of slow-down depends on configuration, VPN performance, and the inherently high latency of the Tor network. Users trade throughput and latency for layered privacy: common guidance is that Tor alone is already slow, a fast VPN can be markedly quicker, and combining them (either Tor-over-VPN or VPN-over-Tor) will almost always be slower than either tool used alone [1] [2] [3]. The practical recommendation across the sources is to use a VPN for routine performance-sensitive activities and reserve combined setups for threat models that require extra anonymity despite the predictable speed penalty [4] [5].
1. Why speed drops: the technical bottleneck everyone sees
Every source converges on the same technical root cause: adding a VPN and Tor stacks encryption and routing hops, increasing both bandwidth overhead and round-trip latency. Tor routes traffic through multiple volunteer relays and applies layered encryption, which already produces high latency and modest throughput; adding a VPN places another encrypted tunnel either before Tor (VPN → Tor) or after it (Tor → VPN), so traffic must traverse more links and cryptographic processing, which reduces throughput and raises latency [3] [6]. Empirical figures in the reporting illustrate the gap: Tor average speeds are reported around ~5 Mbps, while modern VPNs—especially those using WireGuard—can exceed hundreds of Mbps; combining them will never beat the fastest leg and will typically approach the slower Tor-limited regime [2] [7]. The practical effect is that activities sensitive to latency and throughput like streaming, gaming, and large downloads degrade markedly when both are used.
2. Different setups, different slowdowns: Tor-over-VPN vs VPN-over-Tor
Sources emphasize that configuration matters: Tor-over-VPN (connect to VPN first, then Tor) hides Tor usage from the ISP but still sends traffic into the inherently slow Tor network; VPN-over-Tor (Tor first, then VPN) routes traffic through Tor into the VPN, which can preserve Tor’s exit-node anonymity but is more complex and often slower or fragile [1] [3]. The community guidance from Tor-affiliated discussions cautions that misconfiguration can reduce anonymity and add risks, and it notes that VPN-over-Tor setups are usually unnecessary and slower for most users [4] [5]. Some commercial VPNs offer “Tor over VPN” servers that attempt to optimize the handoff, but these do not eliminate Tor’s latency ceiling; they only change which network dominates the perceived speed hit [7].
3. Real-world numbers and research: how bad is “slow” in practice?
Quantitative claims across sources show a stark contrast: articles cite Tor’s practical throughput averaging around 5 Mbps, while contemporary VPNs—when using high-performance protocols like WireGuard—can deliver hundreds of Mbps or more [2] [7]. Academic research aims to reduce Tor latency (for example, satellite-assisted routing proposals that estimate measurable latency reductions for some circuits), but these are experimental and do not change the basic reality that the multi-hop design of Tor remains the primary limiter of speed [8]. Community troubleshooting and forum threads going back years consistently report “very slow” connections when mixing Tor and VPNs, and respondents advise that using Tor alone often yields better performance than naive combined setups unless the user understands the trade-offs and has specialized needs [9] [5].
4. Threat models and trade-offs: when the speed hit is worth it
Across the sources, experts stress that the decision is not solely technical but tied to threat models: journalists, dissidents, or whistleblowers may accept pronounced slowdowns to gain layered privacy or to hide Tor usage from oppressive ISPs, while casual users are better served by a high-quality VPN for routine privacy and speed [1] [4]. Discussions emphasize that combining tools can introduce new risks (logging, configuration errors, single points of failure) and that adding a VPN does not automatically increase anonymity unless configured with a clear purpose; these risks sometimes outweigh the marginal privacy gains, especially given the significant performance costs [5] [4]. The consensus is pragmatic: use a VPN for everyday speed-sensitive tasks and reserve combined setups for situations where avoiding detection or adding redundancy justifies the slower connection.
5. Bottom line for users: practical guidance you can act on
Practical guidance from the sources boils down to three points: use Tor alone when Tor’s anonymity is the goal and you can tolerate slowness; use a fast VPN (WireGuard-capable) when performance matters and you accept the VPN provider’s trust model; combine them only when your threat model requires it and you can tolerate the predictable performance penalty and increased complexity [2] [1] [5]. Community and research channels also suggest that experimental improvements to Tor’s latency may moderate these gaps over time, but as of the latest reporting the speed cost of layering VPN+Tor remains significant and should be an explicit, conscious trade-off rather than a default choice [8] [6].