Can combining a tracker blocklist with browser privacy settings break website functionality and how to mitigate it?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Combining aggressive tracker blocklists with strict browser privacy settings can and does break website functionality: vendors and users report lists and modes that cause site breakage and vendors (Mozilla, Disconnect, DuckDuckGo) tune lists to avoid that [1] [2] [3]. Browser vendors expose mitigations — site exceptions, cookie allow-lists, and debug flows — because blocking storage or third‑party resources can prevent logins, payments, embeds and analytics from working [4] [1].
1. Why blocklists + strict settings sometimes break sites
Blocklists operate by preventing requests to tracker domains or by blocking access to browser storage; when combined with a browser’s tracking‑prevention mode they can stop scripts and cookies that sites rely on for core flows (login, carts, ads used for paywalls, embedded widgets). Firefox and other browsers use curated lists (from Disconnect) as the core of protections and adjust entries to reduce breakage, acknowledging that blocking third‑party origins can remove legitimate functionality [1] [2]. Users and forums report concrete failures tied to specific lists — for example, EasyPrivacy causing Vivaldi pages to render incorrectly until the list was disabled [5].
2. How different blocklist approaches change the risk
There are two practical approaches: curated, human‑maintained lists (Disconnect, DuckDuckGo lists used in Firefox and extensions) and behaviorally learned lists (Privacy Badger). Curated lists aim to balance privacy and compatibility and are incorporated into products with testing (Disconnect’s lists power Firefox tracking protection; DuckDuckGo publishes blocklists used by its extensions) [2] [3] [1]. Privacy Badger learns at runtime and offers a quick disable toggle for a site when it breaks, which reduces long‑term compatibility surprises but can miss or overblock some resources [6].
3. Known technical failure modes
Common failure modes documented by vendors and community sources include: blocking third‑party scripts that sites treat as essential (analytics, widgets), preventing cookie or storage access that authentication depends on, and DNS/CNAME cloaking that hides trackers behind first‑party‑looking hostnames so network filters may miss them or overreach when they try to block them [7] [8] [5]. Microsoft’s tracking prevention explicitly notes that enforcement may restrict access to storage and recommends per‑site allow/deny controls to debug broken experiences [4].
4. Vendor and maintainer safeguards
Blocklist maintainers and browser teams actively mitigate breakage. Mozilla freezes and stages list changes to let fixes bake in and runs breakage studies before rolling updates; they also delegate list issue reports to Disconnect [1]. Disconnect documents why some trackers are left unblocked (e.g., DNT signaling complexities) and keeps separate “Content” portions users can opt into blocking — reflecting tradeoffs between privacy and compatibility [2]. DuckDuckGo’s repo asks users to report usability issues and does not accept blind external pulls so maintainers can control changes [3].
5. Practical mitigations you can apply
Use these vendor‑supported tools and workflows: (a) switch the browser tracking mode from “Aggressive”/full block to “Balanced” or the vendor default to reduce breakage (Microsoft’s tracking prevention guidance) [4]; (b) use per‑site exceptions or the browser’s Block/Allow cookie controls to allow required storage for a domain while keeping global protections on [4]; (c) disable or toggle specific blocklists known to be problematic (forums show disabling EasyPrivacy fixed Vivaldi breakage) [5]; (d) for extensions that learn (Privacy Badger), use the “Disable for this site” button when a site breaks and report the issue via the project’s bug channels [6]; (e) prefer curated lists from well‑maintained providers and open an issue with maintainers if you see breakage rather than adding ad‑hoc lists [3] [1].
6. Tradeoffs and hidden agendas to watch for
Blocklist maintainers have priorities: Disconnect focuses on privacy and may keep some trackers blocked even if they claim to respect DNT because of practical disparities across browsers [2]. Commercial or automated lists (and very aggressive “pro++” DNS lists) warn they may contain false positives that limit functionality and recommend use only for experienced admins [8]. DuckDuckGo and Mozilla lock list workflows to maintain quality and to avoid well‑meaning external changes that could introduce breakage [3] [1].
7. Final diagnosis
Combining tracker blocklists with strict browser privacy settings will improve privacy but predictably increases the risk of breaking parts of the web; vendors build controls (per‑site allow, staged list updates, user toggles) because real sites still depend on blocked resources [1] [4] [2]. Practical mitigation is straightforward: start less aggressive, use per‑site exceptions, prefer curated lists maintained by major projects, and report breakage to the list maintainers [6] [3] [5]. Limitations: available sources do not mention specific step‑by‑step commands for every browser beyond the general Block/Allow, toggles, and disable‑for‑site mechanisms noted above [4] [6] [5].