Are there any VPN providers that offer integrated Tor browser support?

1. Which providers actually offer built‑in Tor/Onion support?

Proton VPN and NordVPN are the clearest examples of vendors that offer built‑in “Tor over VPN” or Onion‑over‑VPN server options — features listed as part of their product pages and noted across multiple reviews ^{[1] [2] [4]}, while ExpressVPN, Surfshark, Private Internet Access and several other large providers are routinely recommended as “Tor‑friendly” because they allow Tor traffic through their servers or provide guidance for using a VPN before starting Tor Browser ^{[3] [1] [5]}.

2. What “integrated support” actually means in practice

“Integrated” can mean two different things in the sources: a VPN that runs special servers which route a user’s traffic into the Tor network (Onion‑over‑VPN), versus a VPN that simply allows Tor traffic or suggests the workflow “connect VPN → open Tor Browser.” NordVPN and Proton VPN are repeatedly described as offering special Tor‑configured servers or an explicit Onion‑over‑VPN option, whereas ExpressVPN and many others simply support Tor traffic on normal servers and may offer an .onion site or guidance rather than a single‑click Tor integration ^{[1] [4] [3] [6]}.

3. The security tradeoffs and Tor Project’s view

Combining VPNs and Tor changes threat models and can both help and harm anonymity: a VPN hides Tor usage from an ISP but shifts trust to the VPN operator, and misconfiguration can weaken Tor’s protections — the Tor Project does not generally recommend using a VPN unless the user knows how to configure both tools safely ^{[4] [7]}. Reviews emphasize that a trustworthy, audited no‑logs policy, RAM‑only servers and strong encryption matter when a VPN is added to Tor, because the VPN will see users’ IPs and can detect Tor usage even if it cannot see end‑to‑end Tor traffic ^{[2] [5] [6]}.

4. Practical considerations: speed, platforms and usability

Providers pitch Onion‑over‑VPN as easier for non‑technical users — it removes the need to route a Tor SOCKS proxy manually — but users will typically see slower performance and some sites block Tor exit nodes; reviews therefore stress picking fast, audited providers and testing on the user’s platforms, noting that Tor’s native support varies (for example, Tor is limited on iOS and needs third‑party clients) ^{[1] [8] [4] [9]}. Independent testing pages and roundups also flag that only a subset of top vendors provide dedicated Tor servers, and speed/UX differ across providers ^{[1] [6]}.

5. Industry context, biases and how recommendations are shaped

Consumer guidance on “best VPNs for Tor” is common but must be read with caveats: many comparison sites rely on affiliate revenue, disclose shared ownership or editorial relationships, and emphasize different priorities (speed, streaming, or privacy audits) that tilt recommendations ^{[5] [1]}. Some sources assert only “two” providers offer dedicated Tor servers while others include a broader list of Tor‑friendly vendors; that discrepancy reflects differing definitions of “integrated” and commercial influences in VPN publishing ^{[1] [5]}.

Bottom line

Yes — Proton VPN and NordVPN are the clearest mainstream examples of providers that offer integrated Onion‑over‑VPN/Tor server options, while ExpressVPN, Surfshark, PIA and several others support Tor traffic or advertise Tor‑friendly features without the same single‑click server integrations; users should weigh the practical tradeoffs, heed the Tor Project’s caution about combining tools improperly, and prefer providers with transparent audits and strong no‑logs practices ^{[1] [2] [3] [7] [5]}.