What are zero-day exploits and how do they target browsers?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Zero-day exploits are attacks that leverage software flaws unknown to the vendor and therefore unpatched, allowing attackers to operate before defenses exist [1]. Browsers are a favored avenue because they process untrusted web content for billions of users; recent reporting shows Chrome and WebKit-based browsers have been frequent zero-day targets, with multiple high‑profile, actively exploited browser zero-days disclosed in 2024–2025 [2] [3].
1. What “zero‑day” really means and why time matters
The term zero‑day refers to the absence of days between discovery and exploitation: the vendor has zero days to prepare a fix once the vulnerability is being used in the wild [1] [4]. That immediacy makes these flaws especially dangerous because attackers can create reliable exploits before signatures, behavioral rules, or patches are available; vendors and defenders often have to reverse‑engineer attacks to produce a fix, which sometimes takes days but often follows quickly once active exploitation is observed [5].
2. Why browsers are prime targets
Browsers are ubiquitous gateways to the Internet and routinely render content from untrusted sites, plug‑ins, and media — a rich surface for exploitation; Google’s telemetry shows Chrome was the primary browser target in 2024, reflecting both its popularity and exposure [2]. Browser engines like WebKit and Chrome internals (renderers, JavaScript engines, IPC layers) have been the subject of multiple zero‑days because memory‑corruption and sandbox‑escape bugs in those components can lead to full code execution on a user’s device with little or no action required by the victim [3] [6] [7].
3. How attackers weaponize browser zero‑days — techniques and chains
Attackers exploit classes of bugs such as use‑after‑free, out‑of‑bounds read/write, and memory corruption to force a browser into running attacker code; these vulnerabilities can be chained (an information‑leak plus a corruption) to bypass mitigations and break sandboxes [2] [6]. Some campaigns use “watering‑hole” or malicious webpage techniques — simply visiting a manipulated site can trigger no‑click exploits or require only a single link click — while targeted espionage operations have used exploit chains to install persistent backdoors on mobile and desktop devices [2] [8] [9].
4. Who is doing this and for what purpose — the buyer’s market and motives
Zero‑days appear in both broad criminal operations and in highly targeted state‑level espionage; commercial spyware vendors, nation‑state groups, and criminal actors have all been linked to browser zero‑day use, sometimes against specific governmental or corporate targets [10] [8]. Market dynamics matter: zero‑days are valuable commodities, and reporting and vendor advisories suggest that some exploits are hoarded for targeted missions while others are used more widely, which can rapidly “burn” a vulnerability and force vendors to patch [2] [5].
5. Defenses, tradeoffs and the evolving landscape
Vendors and defenders have made measurable progress — mitigations like stronger memory‑safety measures, sandbox improvements, and features such as Lockdown Mode have reduced successful browser and mobile zero‑day exploitation rates, with Google reporting a drop in browser zero‑days in 2024 compared with prior years [11] [12]. Still, defenders face tradeoffs: patches and mitigations reduce attack surface but seldom eliminate risk entirely, and detection lags when exploits are novel; security vendors and consultants emphasize layered defenses, rapid patching, and threat‑intel sharing while some commercial writeups push proprietary solutions and may have business incentives to emphasize the severity of the problem [13] [1].