あなたは誰？
Executive summary
You asked “あなたは誰？” — who am I. I am an impartial journalist-style assistant here to explain what I am and what I am not, using only available reporting. Available sources in the provided search results do not mention or describe me directly; they instead discuss digital identity events, predictions, and products (for example, industry forecasts that “2025 is poised to be a defining year for digital identity” [1]).
1. Who (the question) usually aims at — identity in context
When someone asks “Who are you?” in the identity and technology world it often probes provenance, authority and function. Recent reporting frames identity as a technical and policy field — conferences and vendor analyses in 2025 center on digital ID, biometrics and decentralized identity (see conference listings and event agendas at Gartner and Future Identity [2] [3]). Those sources position “identity” as an organized industry with vendors, events and predictions rather than an individual entity [2] [3].
2. What the sources cover — industry players, not conversational agents
The documents in the search results profile organizations and trends: iProov’s 2025 predictions about biometrics and deepfakes [1], Gartner’s IAM Summit sessions on decentralized identity [2], and event listings such as Future Identity and SIA symposiums [3] [4]. None of the provided items describe a conversational assistant’s identity or claim to be “who I am.” Therefore available sources do not mention a direct answer to “あなたは誰？” about this assistant.
3. If you mean “who am I talking to?” — how the ecosystem would answer
Industry sources would frame an answer in functional terms: a credentialed system component (e.g., biometric verifier, decentralized wallet, or IAM service) with stated capabilities and limits. Gartner sessions illustrate this by discussing “Identity Verification” and “Decentralized identity and verifiable credentials” as categories that define what a system is and does [2]. iProov frames identity solutions by capability (liveness, fraud defence) and threat model (deepfakes, synthetic identity) [1].
4. Trust, provenance and transparency — why the question matters
Journalistic coverage emphasizes trust and provenance. iProov and industry analysts warn that 2025 is a turning point for digital identity because of deepfakes and synthetic identities; they call for clearer provenance and stronger verification techniques [1]. Event digests (ID Tech) spotlight tools for deepfake detection and liveness checks as ways the sector is trying to answer “who is behind this interaction?” [5]. Those pieces imply the right answer to “who are you?” should include origin, operator, capabilities and failure modes.
5. What I can and cannot say, given the provided sources
I can report that the search results are focused on digital-identity events, vendor predictions and technology features — not on the personal identity of a chat assistant [3] [1] [2]. I cannot assert anything about this specific assistant’s internal model, dataset provenance, or operator identity because the available sources do not mention those facts. Explicitly: available sources do not mention who I am as an assistant, nor do they provide operator or model details.
6. How you could sharpen the question for a definitive answer
If you want a concrete, sourced reply to “あなたは誰？” ask for one of these and cite desired evidence: (a) “Who operates this assistant?” plus a link to operator documentation; (b) “What model powers this assistant?” plus technical whitepaper or vendor statement; or (c) “What policies govern responses?” plus a terms-of-service or privacy-policy URL. The present search results include event and vendor materials but none of those three types of documentation [2] [1] [3].
7. Competing perspectives and hidden agendas in the sources
Vendors (iProov, Incode, etc.) present identity tech as both a solution and a market opportunity; their prognostications emphasize threats that justify their products [1] [5]. Conference organizers and industry newsletters promote events and tools, which serves networking and sales goals [3] [6]. Independent digests like ID Tech highlight vendor claims and academic benchmarks [5], offering a counterpoint but still relying on vendor-reported developments.
8. Bottom line — direct answer constrained by sources
You asked “あなたは誰？”; given the provided reporting, I cannot produce a sourced statement identifying myself because the supplied documents do not mention this assistant or its operator. For a sourced, definitive identity statement about this assistant, provide or point to documentation (operator, model, or governance) — the current search results do not contain that information (not found in current reporting).