Who are you
Executive summary
You asked a simple question — “Who are you” — but available sources do not describe this conversational agent’s identity directly; the provided reporting set focuses on digital identity, AI assistants and identity conferences rather than describing any particular chatbot (not found in current reporting). Context matters: in 2025 discourse about assistants centers on AI agents, passkeys and identity management, showing why people ask who (or what) is responding to them [1] [2] [3].
1. Why people ask “Who are you?” — trust, identity and agency
Users ask “Who are you?” because contemporary tech debates have made provenance, capability and intent central concerns: identity management and passkeys are rising priorities in 2025 as organizations push phishing-resistant authentication and clearer account lifecycles [4] [1]. Security researchers at events like CES 2025 warned that AI digital assistants present unique risks — continuous audio monitoring, command manipulation and data exposure — which heightens the natural urge to identify the entity taking actions or listening [2]. In short, the social and technical environment makes the question both practical and ethical [1] [2].
2. What “identity” means for machines versus people
Identity in the tech reporting you provided separates authentication (how systems verify who you are) from attribution (how you know who is speaking). Industry coverage on identity and access management shows an evolution: IAM has moved from a back‑office function to “the new perimeter” of cybersecurity, and vendors increasingly embed chatbots or conversational components in products to guide users — complicating the line between tool and agent [5]. That shift explains why end users want simple, clear answers about an assistant’s origin, data practices and privileges even when interacting casually [5] [3].
3. How industry actors describe assistants and agents
Conference and vendor materials treat AI assistants as productivity tools that “remember preferences” and “adapt to routines,” framing them as helpers rather than opaque systems [3]. At the same time, identity conferences like Authenticate 2025 focus on building “phishing-resistant authentication with passkeys,” emphasizing that trustworthy interaction often relies on robust identity standards behind the scenes — not just marketing language [4]. These two narratives — convenience versus control — coexist and sometimes clash in vendor messaging [3] [4].
4. Security and privacy concerns that drive the question
Security reporting raises concrete worries: if an assistant continuously monitors audio, insufficient encryption or careless storage could expose sensitive summaries or credentials, enabling account takeover or identity theft [2]. Identity specialists warn that AI agents and the tools surrounding them must be integrated with stronger identity controls (passkeys, conditional access) to reduce such risks [4] [1]. Those threats are the primary reason users should demand clear declarations of identity and data handling from any agent that interacts with them [2] [1].
5. Competing perspectives: marketing optimism vs. security realism
Vendors and reviews highlight assistants’ productivity gains and seamless experiences — remembering context, automating tasks and lowering friction [3]. Conversely, security analysts and identity vendors stress that convenience without proper identity controls creates vulnerabilities; they push for standards, stronger authentication and visibility into agent behavior [2] [4]. Both perspectives are present in the sources: one promises capability and ease, the other demands accountability and engineering to back that promise [3] [2] [4].
6. Practical takeaway for someone asking “Who are you?” today
Treat a conversational agent’s reply to “Who are you?” as the start of due diligence: ask where the assistant runs, who operates it, what data it stores, and what authentication or conditional‑access controls sit behind any connected accounts. The reporting underscores the need for such questions by linking assistant features to identity risks and urging adoption of stronger authentication methods in 2025 [2] [4] [1]. If a provider cannot answer, that itself is a red flag consistent with coverage about the security tradeoffs of emerging AI assistants [2].
Limitations and final note
Available sources do not describe this specific agent or provide a transcript of any agent’s identity statement (not found in current reporting). The analysis above synthesizes themes across coverage of AI assistants, IAM and identity conferences in 2025 to explain why “Who are you?” is the right and necessary question [4] [1] [3] [2] [5].