Who developed memoblast and when was it first introduced?
Executive summary
Available sources show multiple products and apps with names like “Memo Blast” or “MemoBlast,” including an iOS app attributed to developer Edmondo Borasio (App Store listing) and commercial dietary-supplement sites that present MemoBlast as a branded nootropic product (memoblast.org, memoblast.net) [1] [2] [3]. None of the provided results give a clear singular inventor or an introduction date tying all uses of the name together; sources do not mention a definitive “who developed Memoblast” or “when it was first introduced” as a single item [1] [2] [3].
1. Name collisions: apps, supplements and marketplaces
The search results surface at least three distinct uses of the same or similar name: an iPhone app listed on Apple’s App Store credited to developer Edmondo Borasio (Memo Blast), commercial supplement product pages presenting “MemoBlast” as a brain‑health/nootropic formula, and retail listings on Walmart and eBay selling products labeled Memo Blast or MemoBlast [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. These are separate commercial artifacts that share branding but do not, in the available reporting, consolidate into a single origin story [1] [2] [3].
2. The Memo Blast app: a named developer but no launch date in results
Apple’s App Store entry identifies EDMONDO BORASIO as the developer of “Memo Blast,” and the listing notes typical App Store metadata such as privacy practices; the snippet explicitly names the developer [1]. The App Store result in the provided set does not include a publication or first‑release date in its snippet, so an exact introduction date for the app is not present in the current material [1].
3. MemoBlast supplements: company sites promote a proprietary formula but omit origin details
Two official-looking product sites (memoblast.org and memoblast.net) promote “MemoBlast” as an advanced memory/nootropic supplement with marketing language about natural ingredients and scientific backing. Those pages describe the product and its purported benefits but do not, in the snippets available, identify a founding developer, a company owner, or a first‑release date [2] [3]. The sites act like brand storefronts rather than archival records of the product’s creation [2] [3].
4. Retail evidence of the product’s market presence, not its creation date
Walmart and eBay listings show Memo Blast/MemoBlast being sold in capsule form and multi‑pack formats, indicating the product is commercially distributed and present on mainstream retail channels [4] [5] [6]. Those retail pages document active sales but do not provide documentation about who originally developed the formula or when it was first introduced to market [6] [4] [5].
5. Secondary reviews and coverage provide timing but not origin details
A November 2025 review page titled “MemoBlast Reviews 2025 | Is It Legit Or a Scam?” discusses the supplement’s formula and benefits and is dated November 2025, which confirms public discussion of MemoBlast by that time [7]. However, that review does not appear in the provided snippets to assert who developed the product or its initial launch date; it only shows the product was active and being evaluated in 2025 [7].
6. What the available sources do not say (key research gaps)
Available sources do not mention a single inventor or company that universally “developed Memoblast,” nor do they supply a first‑introduction date tying the app, supplement sites, and retail listings to one origin [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. There is no consolidated corporate history, patent, press release, trademark filing, or news article in the provided set that establishes who created “Memoblast” or the exact date it was launched as a single product or brand (not found in current reporting).
7. How to resolve the ambiguity — recommended next steps
To identify a definitive developer and first introduction date, consult primary records beyond these snippets: the full App Store page for release history and version dates, WHOIS/trademark registrations for memoblast.* domains, company registration records for the brand owner, press releases or news archives announcing product launches, and product packaging/NDC or UPC records from retailers. Those documentary sources are not included in the current results and would directly answer “who” and “when” (available sources do not mention those records).
Summary judgment: public evidence in the provided results confirms at least one developer name for an app (EDMONDO BORASIO) and shows commercial supplement brands called MemoBlast in circulation by 2025, but does not establish a single developer or a first‑introduced date that applies across all uses of the name [1] [2] [3] [7].