Your fact-checks will appear here
Major tech firms and safety vendors use a hybrid of legacy hash-matching, perceptual/video hashing, and machine-learned classifiers—augmented by proprietary intelligence and red-teaming—to find AI-gen...
Since 2020 platforms and specialist vendors have moved beyond simple hash‑matching to deploy machine‑learning classifiers, scene‑sensitive video hashing, text‑based detectors and automated triage tool...
Tech firms detect known CSAM mostly by hash-matching: converting images/videos into perceptual or cryptographic hashes and comparing them to verified databases such as PhotoDNA and other vendor lists ...
Investigators can establish access to CSAM without a suspect’s physical device by tracing cloud-stored matches, server logs, account metadata, and financial or network traces — for example, on-device ...
There is clear, repeated reporting that industry vendors and non‑profits have developed AI classifiers able to flag novel and beyond traditional (, , , ) . However, none of the provided documents say ...
Regulators, independent researchers, standards bodies and vendors are converging on a picture of validation and explainability for automated CSAM detection that treats accuracy as necessary but not su...
Machine-learning classifiers (often called CSAM classifiers or predictive AI) are presented by multiple child-safety organizations and vendors as the primary way to find novel or obfuscated CSAM that ...