Your fact-checks will appear here
(Andrology) Citations (1) · Mapped citations (37) · UniProtKB (37) Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell Merged From: International journal of andrology and Journal of andrology.
Large, professionally measured samples are concentrated in a handful of studies: a 2024 Chinese meta‑analysis pooled 23 studies covering 34,060 men (plus 19 international studies with 15,216 men) maki...
Large, peer‑reviewed efforts exist but they cluster into two types: systematic reviews/meta‑analyses that pool clinician‑measured studies across countries and many smaller, regional clinician‑measured...
Medical literature consistently shows wide natural variability in penile length and girth, with large pooled datasets placing mean erect length around and significant regional and temporal variation r...
Yes — several recent peer‑reviewed systematic reviews and meta‑analyses published 2020–2025 compare penile length and girth across countries and regions. Major meta‑analyses include a 2024/2025 WHO‑re...
If you want peer‑reviewed anthropometric research on male genital measurements in the U.S., the clearest entry points are medical journals that publish urology/andrology papers (examples in the datase...
Large, peer‑reviewed syntheses — notably a 2024–25 systematic review and meta‑analysis that pooled clinical measurements and Veale’s earlier work — are the closest thing to “most reliable” data: the U...