Your fact-checks will appear here
Research center affiliated with University of Pennsylvania
, and share core fact-checking goals—investigating claims and assigning a verdict—but they differ in rating systems, institutional footing, claim selection and historical focus, producing mostly high ...
Journalists and independent fact‑checkers verified Barack Obama’s birth records through a combination of examining physical documents provided by the campaign or Hawaii’s health officials, consulting ...
is routinely evaluated by third‑party reviewers as highly factual and broadly nonpartisan: and university guides characterize it as a nonpartisan fact‑checking project affiliated with and rate it very...
The provided documents do not identify donors to a site named “”; the reporting instead contains detailed funding disclosures for and fundraising commentary about , which cannot be assumed to represen...
is repeatedly described in the reporting as a nonpartisan fact‑checking project housed at the and broadly assessed by third‑party reviewers as minimally or centrist in political bias, though some meas...
’s historical and present funding is dominated by the Annenberg family of sources — ’s endowment and Annenberg Foundation support have been the largest sustained backers — while targeted grants from m...
Several mainstream fact‑checking organizations have evaluated claims made by Fox News and its on‑air personalities; PolitiFact maintains a dedicated archive of Fox News fact‑checks and a database of r...
Fact-checking is the activity of verifying claims and is commonly done by organizations that use human editors and reviewers; leading U.S. outfits such as FactCheck.org and PolitiFact describe editori...
is funded primarily through and , with a history of additional grants from private foundations and occasional project money from tech platforms; the organization says it does not accept corporate, uni...
There is no single repository in the supplied reporting that catalogs fact-checks specifically about that politicians “had bodily accidents” (such as soiling themselves or fainting) — the sources inst...
and both perform journalistic fact-checking but diverge in scale, presentation and rating systems: PolitiFact applies a graded scale and publishes a large volume of short verdicts, while FactCheck.org...
There is no evidence in the provided reporting that directly assesses the political slant of a site named “Factually,” so a definitive classification of Factually as conservative or liberal cannot be ...
are funded by a mix of university endowments, foundations, journalism labs, platform grants, parent news organizations and public donations — not a single monolithic source — and the exact mix differs...
is a nonpartisan fact‑checking project housed at the that employs a small professional staff plus fellows and translators to produce fact checks; its primary financial backbone is the Annenberg endowm...
The claim that fact-checkers are “lame” is an understandable reaction to perceived disagreement and bias, but it is overstated: independent reviews show fact-checkers are useful tools with limits—disa...
Major, established fact‑checking organizations that regularly track Donald Trump’s claims include The Washington Post (documenting thousands of claims per term), FactCheck.org, PolitiFact and CNN’s fa...
Established nonprofit outlets such as FactCheck.org and PolitiFact lead mainstream fact‑checking, with explicit editorial processes and public missions to correct political misinformation . Academic s...
There is no single, authoritative “expert ranking” of Snopes, FactCheck.org and PolitiFact for 2025 in the provided sources; instead, reporting and academic studies describe their reputations, agreeme...
The documents provided do not directly show how the domain or entity "factually.co" discloses funding or ownership; instead they reference three distinct organizations with similar names—, , and —each...