Your fact-checks will appear here
Organization
Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) is a large, established veterans charity that reports serving more than 272,000 beneficiaries and holds recent endorsements such as Charity Navigator’s positive assessmen...
Allegations that “Wounded Warrior Project” (WWP) is a scam split into two separate problems in the public record: third‑party criminal groups using similar names to impersonate or steal donations—docu...
Charity ratings and reports indicate that charities with the lowest administrative-cost percentages are typically those that spend , a threshold reported by CharityWatch and reflected across multiple ...
Charity watchdogs show Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) currently rated highly by several major evaluators: Charity Navigator lists WWP as a 4‑star charity (per its site) and BBB Wise Giving Alliance/Giv...
Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) is a federally tax-exempt 501(c) charity that says it serves more than 272,000 post‑9/11 veterans and registered over 2,250 new participants per month in 2024; WWP holds ...
St. Jude / ALSAC continues to receive top marks from major charity evaluators: Charity Navigator shows a 99% score and a four‑star rating in recent profiles , Give.org lists ALSAC as an Accredited Cha...
Most available data show that charitable giving to military and veterans’ organizations is small compared with total U.S. philanthropy: Indiana University’s Military & Veterans Community Index (MVCI) ...
(WWP) are generally positive but not uniform: has given WWP high marks (commonly cited as a four‑star rating) while the consistently lists WWP as an accredited charity meeting its 20 standards; ’s tra...
Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) is currently presented by major charity-watchers as an accredited and highly rated nonprofit: Charity Navigator lists WWP as a four‑star charity, the Better Business Bure...
Major independent evaluators—CharityWatch, Charity Navigator and Candid/GuideStar—flag a small group of veteran charities as top-rated for financial transparency and efficiency; Homes For Our Troops, ...
Charitable “overhead” rankings depend on which metric is used, and none of the provided sources supply a definitive, sourced list naming specific US charities with the absolute in 2024; watchdogs do, ...
Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) reports that about 70% of its spending — more than $263 million in fiscal year 2024 — went directly to programs and services for wounded veterans, families, and caregiver...
, , and the reached markedly different conclusions about during the 2016–2018 scandal: Charity Navigator moved from mixed ratings to a temporary four‑star endorsement then back to three stars as finan...
Charity evaluators mostly rate St. Jude (and its fundraising arm ALSAC) highly on financial accountability and transparency: Charity Navigator gives ALSAC/St. Jude a four‑star, near‑top score (99% or ...
Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) has recent, publicly available audited financial statements — including a consolidated audit dated January 17, 2025 — and posts Form 990s and annual reports on its websit...
Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) faced steep revenue and program‑spending declines after the 2016 controversies: donations fell roughly 20–30% in 2016–2017 and program expenses dropped from a peak of abo...
The combined analyses identify a consistent set of highly rated charities serving veterans and, to a lesser extent, first responders: prominent names include the Gary Sinise Foundation, Homes For Our ...
Independent audited financial statements and Wounded Warrior Project’s IRS Form 990 returns show the charity reported roughly 70% of expenses classified as programs in fiscal 2024 and stated administr...
, and the each use ratios that divide program, fundraising and administrative dollars to judge financial efficiency, but they differ sharply in which ratios they publish, how they calculate inputs, an...
is navigable but messy: independent evaluators like , , and publish ranked lists and methodology guides to steer donors toward efficient, transparent nonprofits . Each evaluator uses different metrics...