Your fact-checks will appear here
Most modern lists of “credible” Bigfoot sightings are curated by enthusiasts’ organizations such as the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO), which classifies reports and maintains a searchab...
Bigfoot reports span centuries of Indigenous lore and modern eyewitness claims; mainstream databases such as the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO) catalog thousands of reports and classify...
The most scrutinized physical traces attributed to Bigfoot are hair samples, plaster casts of large footprints, and a few videos/photographs — with hair DNA tests repeatedly tracing samples to known a...
Government records show curiosity about Bigfoot has touched at least a few federal and state agencies, most notably the FBI, which released a historical file on correspondence and physical-sample inqu...
Televised and amateur-led field expeditions searching for Bigfoot are common and increasingly use modern scientific tools — drones, thermal imaging, DNA sampling and data algorithms — as shown by prog...
There is a long-running mix of eyewitness reports, organized databases, and a few contested scientific claims — but mainstream science says there is no definitive physical evidence that Sasquatch/Bigf...
Private groups such as the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization (BFRO) collect sightings through self-submitted reports, an all-volunteer investigator network, and a public online database, then ass...
Multiple universities and at least one U.S. federal agency have appeared in the record as participants or at least as having handled inquiries or samples related to Bigfoot/Sasquatch research: notable...