Is viewing CSAM illegal?
Viewing or possessing child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is treated as a crime in U.S. law and by major advocacy groups: federal statutes and state laws make creation, possession, or distribution of C...
Your fact-checks will appear here
Non-profit organization in the USA
Viewing or possessing child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is treated as a crime in U.S. law and by major advocacy groups: federal statutes and state laws make creation, possession, or distribution of C...
Unintentional exposure to CSAM (for example via a pop-up or an unsolicited link) can trigger reporting, investigation, and in some circumstances prosecution — but criminal liability generally requires...
Viewing child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is treated seriously under U.S. law: federal and state statutes criminalize the creation, possession, and distribution of CSAM and treat it as evidence of ch...
Federal law treats some non-photographic images — (CGI), AI outputs, and drawings — as (CSAM) when they meet statutory and judicial thresholds that focus on whether the depiction is a "visual depictio...
In the United States, existing federal law criminalizes creating, possessing, or distributing CSAM and treats such material as evidence of child sexual abuse—penalties apply to possession and distribu...
Successful defenses in online CSAM cases most commonly arise from procedural and evidentiary challenges—defective search warrants, weak chain-of-custody or indigent proof of knowledge—or from evolving...
Legal and technical limits on tracing IPs and devices in CSAM investigations balance powerful investigative tools against privacy and encryption protections: U.S. law requires providers to report “app...
Digital forensics uses multiple, converging techniques—file hashing and fuzzy hashing, on-device/client-side matching, artifact timeline and metadata analysis, cloud-account vouchers and reporting, an...
The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 would impose new operational duties on large online providers—expanding mandatory reporting, annual transparency filings, and specific information requirements for CyberTipli...
Available reporting in the provided results does not identify a public figure named “Tim Harpole” with a staff roster; sources instead reference multiple different Harpoles (Brian Harpole as a securit...
Law enforcement-run honeypots implicated in CSAM investigations sit at the intersection of several federal statutes (notably the PROTECT Act reporting duties to NCMEC, federal CSAM criminal statutes, ...
"CSAM" refers to multiple organisations and topics in the provided reporting: most prominently the Canadian Society of Addiction Medicine (CSAM–SMCA), which ran national scientific conferences in 2025...
federal law requires electronic communication and remote computing providers to report apparent child sexual abuse material () and related child-exploitation violations to the once the provider obtain...
Privacy and civil‑liberties groups have publicly urged transparency about the REAL ID “hub” systems that let states query each other’s motor‑vehicle records, and some federal documentation — notably a...
The current federal landscape requires platforms that learn of “apparent” CSAM to report it to NCMEC’s CyberTipline, and recent 2024–2025 federal actions (the REPORT Act and the proposed STOP CSAM Act...
Recent federal and circuit decisions have sharpened constitutional limits on how law enforcement may use third‑party CSAM reports and digital searches: the Ninth Circuit’s Wilson ruling requires warra...
Automated downloads or server-generated thumbnails can create criminal exposure if a person or provider "knowingly" possesses CSAM or if material is indistinguishable from a real child; federal statut...
U.S. federal law criminalizes creation, possession, and distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM); the STOP CSAM Act of 2025 would create new civil and reporting obligations and—critically—us...
Privacy and civil‑liberties groups warn mandatory digital IDs risk surveillance, function‑creep, exclusion and data breaches; advocates cite phone‑home tracking, biometric misuse, and expanded governm...
Courts separate negligence from criminal intent in CSAM prosecutions by focusing on mens rea — what the defendant knew or consciously disregarded — versus failures of care or systems that fall into ne...