Your fact-checks will appear here
Law school of Columbia University
Polling in 2025 shows Americans divided: many still treat gun ownership as a protected constitutional right while majorities support specific limits such as stricter laws and universal background chec...
Lawsuits and congressional pushback did arise over the Obama administration’s drone program, especially after the 2011 killing of U.S. citizen Anwar al‑Awlaki; civil-rights groups sued and Congress pr...
The Supreme Court has issued decisions that both directly affect Donald J. Trump personally (notably the 2024 immunity ruling, discussed in reporting about Trump v. United States) and dozens of ruling...
The Supreme Court has decided and acted on multiple high‑profile disputes involving the Trump administration in 2025–2025, including rulings that (a) allowed parts of the administration’s immigration ...
The phrase "" in public life is a constitutional principle derived from the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses and a longer history of colonial disestablishmentism, but it is ne...
Yes. Historical and more recent sedition prosecutions have at times carried extreme penalties or the threat of them, and several high-profile cases prompted legal or political pushback that changed la...
rolled out by were implemented by through domestic statutes and executive action rather than through prior multilateral renegotiation at , meaning they are unilateral in method . Under prevailing WTO ...
The single most consequential ruling on Fourteenth Amendment equal protection for Black Americans from 2023–2025 was v. , which largely eliminated race‑conscious affirmative action in higher education...
Several Trump administration rollbacks — from broad “10-for-1” deregulation orders to targeted rollbacks of environmental and vehicle-emissions rules — were framed by the White House and allied advoca...
The provided reporting and court materials do not state that the U.S. Supreme Court formally recognizes a doctrine called “natural law” as an independent source of legal authority; contemporary covera...
There is no clear record in the provided sources of any current Supreme Court justice publicly insisting that American judges must follow “natural law” as a binding legal requirement; available report...
Private funding of the White House ballroom and related East Wing work has prompted ethics concerns, proposed congressional restrictions, and scrutiny from news outlets and watchdogs; reporting says r...
Courts have repeatedly treated symptom statements with limited medical support as a credibility issue to be evaluated in context, not automatically dispositive; judges weigh consistency, corroborating...
Major civil‑liberties concerns tied to Donald Trump’s presidencies, and the reporting cited here, center on expanded immigration enforcement and deportations; aggressive executive actions and rollback...