Your fact-checks will appear here
Classified advertisements website
Available reporting does not establish a proven, widespread practice of paying anti-ICE protesters; assertions that demonstrators were being paid come from political leaders, preliminary federal probe...
A posting offering $50 plus a free ticket to sit through and remain for the entire film did circulate and was widely shared online, and local reporting confirms the ad existed and was later suspended;...
Claims that protesters are “paid” have repeatedly been deployed in U.S. politics to delegitimize dissent and shift blame for unrest, from allegations around the Dakota Access Pipeline and Charlottesvi...
There is no credible evidence that the recent wave of and related protests are broadly composed of paid participants; multiple fact-checks and local reporting found the paid-protester claims unsubstan...
A listing offering free tickets plus $50 “per seat occupied” to sit through the documentary in the area was real and went viral, but reporting does not identify who posted it, and there is no confirme...
Social media claims that protesters are “paid” have been a recurring motif across multiple high‑profile events and are commonly amplified without robust evidence; independent fact‑checkers repeatedly ...
Direct evidence that Craigslist maintained bona fide "lists for paid protesters" does not exist in the reporting: viral Craigslist postings were seized on as proof, but fact-checkers and reporters fou...
Major news organizations verify claims about “paid protesters” by checking documentary trails, contacting organizers and institutions, scrutinizing multimedia and timelines, and relying on established...
and other backend records from social‑media platforms and online services to move from anonymous profiles to real‑world suspects, a tactic documented in investigative guides and case summaries . While...
Disinformation networks amplify claims of “paid protesters” by repurposing old or satirical content, weaponizing AI-generated media and chatbots, and leveraging both domestic influencers and foreign s...
Claims that protesters in the United States are broadly “paid” or uniformly “trained” are a mix of documented, anecdotal, and debunked assertions: public figures have repeatedly accused opponents of h...
Claims that anti-ICE demonstrators are routinely “paid” have circulated widely, driven by presidential statements, conservative commentators, and social-media threads, but direct evidence tying widesp...
Fact‑checkers — including , , , and — have repeatedly found high‑profile claims that recent protesters were to be false, often debunking viral videos as AI‑generated or satirical and tracing supposed ...
Claims that large numbers of were "paid" have circulated since 2020, but systematic fact-checking and academic reporting show little credible evidence that mass payments drove participation in the mov...
Since accusing anti‑ICE demonstrators of being “” and “paid insurrectionists,” has repeatedly pointed to social media clips, loose online links and rhetorical assertions but has offered no verifiable ...
Fact‑checking organizations have systematically traced and debunked “paid protester” claims over the last decade by combining archival searches, primary-source verification, digital forensics and cost...
News organizations investigating claims that protesters were “paid” have most often found weak or no direct evidence tying large numbers of demonstrators to wage-for-hire arrangements, while also docu...
Crowd‑for‑hire companies have verifiable ties to U.S. political events, but the record is selective, contested, and often obscured by nondisclosure; the clearest confirmed examples involve the firm Cr...
Newsrooms and independent fact‑checkers have repeatedly found viral “paid protester” clips unreliable, using sourcing, context checks and expert consultations to debunk or qualify claims; recurring pa...