Your fact-checks will appear here
American firm involved in 2020 Arizona vote audit
The most common 2020 election fraud claims centered on alleged machine tampering, illegal ballots (including double voting and out-of-state votes), statistical anomalies presented as proof of fraud, a...
review diverged sharply from standard ‑accredited laboratory audits in methodology, staffing, chain‑of‑custody, scope and , prompting critiques that it ignored established certifications, introduced p...
Public, of voting machines fall into two broad categories: routine, state-mandated post‑election audits (risk‑limiting, hand‑to‑eye, logic-and-accuracy) that found machine counts accurate, and high-pr...
The 2020 presidential election experienced administrative glitches, delays and contentious post-election litigation, but exhaustive reviews, recounts and court rulings found no evidence of widespread ...
The Senate‑commissioned review of ’s 2020 ballots departed sharply from standard, statutorily required post‑election audits by using a private firm with no prior election‑audit experience, adopting ad...
Post‑election audits and state officials concluded that machine tabulation in the 2020 U.S. election was, by and large, accurate and secure: routine post‑election tabulation audits, recounts, and expe...
Claims that "1.4 million ghost votes" existed were part of a broader set of assertions about excess or "ghost" registrants and rejected ballots; independent fact‑checks and expert analysis have repeat...