Your fact-checks will appear here
Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) task forces rely heavily on CyberTipline referrals from the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) as a primary source of investigative leads ...
Defenses and exceptions to CSAM charges are narrow: U.S. advocates and laws emphasize that minors cannot legally consent to sexual images and that possession/distribution of sexually explicit depictio...
NCMEC operates the CyberTipline to collect reports of online child sexual exploitation and routes those reports to the appropriate law enforcement agencies or ICAC task forces; the CyberTipline proces...
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) operates the CyberTipline as a centralized clearinghouse that reviews reports from the public and electronic service providers and then r...
Prosecutors use device metadata, forensic images and account-connection evidence to argue intent in CSAM prosecutions, relying on file timestamps, EXIF and app databases, account-control indicators, a...
Platforms and providers in the U.S. must report suspected child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to the CyberTipline/NCMEC under 18 U.S.C. §2258A; law does not force platforms to actively search but requi...
capture, secure, and retain chronological audit logs—records of administrative actions, data accesses and configuration changes—to support investigations, including , by enabling "who, what, where, wh...
Since 2015 federal courts have split on whether the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) and the CyberTipline reports it receives and forwards constitute state action for Fourth Am...
When a purported CSAM or grooming case lacks a physical device seized under warrant, prosecutors lose a powerful, often central piece of direct digital evidence—but that absence is not automatically f...
Law enforcement typically do not treat a person who promptly reports suspected child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to NCMEC differently by default; rather, the handling depends on how the report was ma...
Yes — people who download child sexual abuse material (CSAM) from file-hosting websites and linked repositories are routinely identified and arrested: investigations and forensic tools trace downloads...
Yes—law enforcement has begun using generative-AI chat transcripts and related records as evidence in investigations involving child sexual abuse material (CSAM), including at least one federal warran...
NCMEC identifies and escalates reports it deems urgent or involving a child in imminent danger and in 2023 flagged 63,892 such cases for law enforcement, but the organization does not publish a fixed ...
The FBI publicly emphasizes proactive programs to identify producers and exploiters of child sexual abuse material (CSAM)—notably ECAP, CEHTTFs, and targeted operations such as child‑sex‑tourism prose...
There is no single numeric threshold of user CSAM abuse reports that universally forces a file‑sharing site to “check a file”; the decision to inspect content is driven by a mix of legal duties, platf...
Reporting suspected possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to the proper channels commonly triggers official review and can lead to lengthy investigations and arrests—as recent local cases s...