Your fact-checks will appear here
To charge someone with child sexual abuse material (CSAM), prosecutors must assemble evidence that proves the material depicts minors and that the defendant knowingly possessed, produced, or distribut...
Generating AI-produced child sexual abuse material (CSAM) in 2025 is legally treated as a serious criminal offense under federal law and increasingly under state law, and the probability of detection ...
criminalizes many forms of when the image depicts a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct or is “virtually indistinguishable” from such a depiction, but enforcement hinges on several legal thresh...
There is no direct, sourced description in the available reporting of specific "legal standards" that the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) applies to evaluate so-called AI-gene...
On today’s books, penalties for wholly AI‑generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) can be lighter than for material involving real children because prosecutors sometimes must charge under differen...
There is clear evidence that AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is being prosecuted and that platforms and companies to authorities, but the sources provided do not document a specific, v...