Your fact-checks will appear here
State and federal law in the U.S. has moved aggressively to criminalize AI-generated sexual images of minors: 45 states have laws against AI/computer-edited CSAM as of August 2025 and several high-pro...
Reporting in the provided sources shows active legislative movement in 2024–2025 on related topics (child marriage, raising or changing ages tied to consent and medical decisions) but does not supply ...
Available sources do not provide a single, definitive percentage of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) reports that result in prosecution in the United States; federal and advocacy reports document ma...
There is no single publicly available, authoritative list of every U.S. criminal case involving generative-AI child sexual abuse material (AI‑generated CSAM); reporting and court decisions show a smal...
Viewing child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is treated seriously under U.S. law: federal and state statutes criminalize the creation, possession, and distribution of CSAM and treat it as evidence of ch...
Privacy laws and mandatory CSAM-reporting regimes currently sit in tension: U.S. federal law treats AI-generated CSAM as illegal and requires service providers to report detected CSAM to NCMEC under 1...
Available reporting and legal summaries show prosecutors have charged people over AI‑generated CSAM and over creation/distribution/possession of CSAM that involved AI tools, but there are no documente...
A growing but uneven patchwork of state laws now criminalizes the production (not merely distribution) of , especially where victims are minors; notable, explicit statutory prohibitions include ’s and...
Only a few primary sources in the reporting explicitly identify a state-level rule that bars probation for convictions tied to child sexual abuse material (); the clearest concrete example is ’ senten...